The evaluation stage takes place during or after implementation and helps determine whether the policy is currently effective or whether it has weaknesses. The evaluation stage delves deeper into the policy by critically analyzing what will make the policy a positive piece of legislation. (Cairney 2013). Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay The goal of the evaluation stage is to determine what can maximize the effectiveness of the proposed policy and eliminate any possible weaknesses. According to Andersen, Fagerhaug and Beltz, the evaluation stage is “an appropriate step after policy implementation, because it allows for an effective assessment of the effectiveness of the policy in terms of achieving policy objectives” ( 2009). The assessment process is important for the policy to achieve its objectives and the aim of this proposed policy is to have a more qualitative way of assessing patients' mental health in an accessible way. The evaluation process. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the policy, stakeholders must collect all possible relevant data to measure its success. The next step in the evaluation is that the program and its results must be described to stakeholders. (Center for Disease Control 2012). After describing the program, stakeholders' evaluation design should be optimized by understanding the possible limitations of their evaluation process, the ability to "realize the scale and scope of [their] data collection data” and accurately use available administrative data (Center for Disease Control, 2012). Depending on the direction of the evaluation design, stakeholders further process the data to ensure credibility. After processing the data, the results are synthesized to determine whether the policy objectives are achieved or not. In this specific case, stakeholders can study, through surveys and patient reports, whether or not more patients were diagnosed in primary care and whether or not they were treated. After reporting this evidence and concluding that it is credible, formal findings are presented and their results can be used to maximize the most effective form of policy implementation and determine whether or not the policy retains the values ​​that it she wishes to maintain. The analysis stage. Policy analysis allows stakeholders to identify whether or not the policy can achieve its own objectives. The analysis stage process includes four overall steps: Identify policy objectives and the problems within them, Establish evaluation criteria, Identify alternative policies, Evaluate these policies, Display and distinguish alternative policies, Monitor the policy implemented (Harrington and Estes, 2004). .When it comes to improving mental health policy, stakeholders can determine which patients benefit from health insurance plans that include mental health coverage. Then, stakeholders can determine whether or not patients with symptoms of mental health disorders were treated and whether they believe they were treated in the best possible way. Stakeholders could then take this information and see if there are other ways to make mental health care more affordable or if there are other health insurance plans that include mental health coverage. However, if the most feasible plan is the current policy being implemented, then stakeholders.