-
Essay / Comparative analysis of “Ain't I Woman” by Isabella Baumfree and “Lynching and The Excuse for It” by Ida B. Wells-barnett
Martin Luther King Jr. once said: “It is -be true that the law I can't make a man love me, but it can stop him from lynching me, and I think that's pretty important. This dominant quote given by Dr. King tells us his feelings as well as his logical reasoning regarding lynching. He accepts the idea that he may not be accepted because of the color of his skin, but at least there are now laws to discourage others from committing a hate crime. This quote describes why we, as humans, should be cognitive thinkers, who reason logically, with a legal system in place structured to give everyone a fair trial by a jury of their peers. Ida B. Wells-Barnett was effective, as evidenced by her ethics, pathos, and logo, while providing factual evidence to convey her points and support her statements in the article "Lynching and Its Excuses." However, it is the opposite case in the article “Ain't I Woman” by Isabella Baumfree, as she used an emotional approach to convey her argument. In this essay, we will compare these two readings while paying attention to ethos, pathos and logos to support the arguments of the two authors. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay First, let's look at these two readings in terms of ethos. Over a period of fifteen years, two thousand people were killed unethically as a result of lynching. No convincing evidence was presented at trial to prove that the alleged individuals were guilty of their crimes. At this time, Jane Addams issued her proclamation in favor of lynching, while assuming that this method of execution without trial might be the only effective way to combat lynching. This was unquestionably unethical, as civilized citizens we should be proactive regarding the ethics that govern our society; be able to reason that respect for human life is what separates us from the animal kingdom. Both authors appeal to pathos in their articles. Ida B. Wells-Barnett felt strong in her moral duty to fight against racial discrimination and unscrupulous violence against her own race. She risked her life by publishing this article, being an African-American woman at a time of high racial political tension. Additionally, Isabella Baumfree used emotional resonance through her writing in order to influence the reader to support the women's rights movement. The article goes on to describe the preferential inequalities of women and African Americans during this era. Isabella Baumfree was active in the field of women's rights. In a male-dominated society, she wanted everyone to be aware of the inequality between African American women and Americans over time. Several claims are made that African Americans and women are inferior to white men. By targeting these men, she is trying to convince her audience to support the women's rights movement. In terms of logos, Ida B. Wells-Barnett later proved by providing public records as proof that many were lynched on what should have been misdemeanor charges, as stated: "This shows that men, not a few -a few, but hundreds, were lynched for crimes, while others were killed without any legally recognized crime, the causes attributed being "mistaken identity", "insult", "bad reputation ". "..