The struggle for communication is common within society and can cause unintentional behaviors and inadvertent situations. Such complications occur in both Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and Alice Sebold's The Lovely Bones, as many characters demonstrate their inability to connect with others. In Shelley's gothic novel, the monster presents endless communication problems, as those he surrounds himself with refuse to accept him due to his naivety and repulsive appearance, as well as Victor's physical distance from his creation, creating a barrier of any connection between them. For Susie, her struggles stem from her death and her perseverance to help her family and friends expose her killer, but her position in and between Heaven restricts her ability to speak out to those she wishes to guide. Alternatively, Susie's ability to see what others are thinking juxtaposes the monster's inability to articulate her thoughts, but in both novels the authors create physical and emotional barriers, through outward appearances and difficult relationships. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get an Original EssayIn The Lovely Bones, Susie's struggle to convey any communication is graphically described in the first chapter: “'Susie! Susie! » I heard my mother calling. “Dinner is ready. He was inside me. He was growling.” As the narrative changes, it depicts both place and perception, with Sebold illustrating the horror of Susie's rape by breaking down physical and moral barriers through non-consensual sex with a child, beginning on novel with a repulsive atmosphere. Barriers are also broken in Frankenstein, with Victor's creation of new life demonstrating radical and immoral actions in the hope that the monster will be "a new species [that] would bless him as its creator", establishing the power to form new life. either for good or for evil. Shelley was influenced by the scientific revolution of the time, with biologists like Luigi Galvani using electricity to experiment on animals, and by the radical romantic writings of her husband, Percy Shelley, about his beliefs in societal equality . These influences make his novel undoubtedly ambitious, using Victor to illustrate how the laws of nature can be altered, to some extent, as seems evident in the monster's response to their later encounter on the mountain: "Yet you , my creator, hate and reject me, your monster, to whom you are bound by bonds that can only be dissolved by the annihilation of one of us", he reveals that his struggles with society were caused by Frankenstein when he abandoned him, alongside the metaphorical "ties" that "bind" them together, eventually rebuilding the emotional barriers broken when Frankenstein abandoned the monster. The online article, Science Fiction: The Science That Fed Frankenstein, confirms that the controversial scientific methods used in the novel sparked a debate over whether the monster was responsible for his own actions: "He didn't is not simply about the creation of life itself, about technology. ambition of science, this is called into question. These are the unfolding moral choices and unforeseen ethical responsibilities that can accompany scientific progress. The article confidently points out Victor's unscrupulous use of science to create something unnatural and,.