Table of contentsIntroductionLiterary reviewMethodologyResultsDiscussionConclusionIntroductionThe research developed by Tusev (2017) aims to explain the reason why Ecuadorians are people characterized by lack of punctuality. The topic begins with the initial explanation of time and why it is important. It was at this time that the people of Mesopotamia were the first to write survey reports. Then the Greeks would use this tendency to be able to determine the correct form of tenses that were important to harvest and be more conscious of not doing so. Once time has developed, an important concept for the development of human beings begins to be used as a working tool. Until before the industrial age, harvesting crops and calculating the seasons was the only utility that had been given to the time. However, from the year 1760, time began to be an unprecedented working tool. This element makes it possible to determine the salaries that each day laborer will receive for their activity in the company. Time will also be a fundamental tool that will organize the work plans of recent companies for the delivery of final works and projects. In the industrial revolution, time allows us to estimate how long it will take to build a house, make a car, and even how long it will take for the next train to arrive from one city to another (Dimchev, 2015 ).Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Time has apparently played a fundamental role in the development of humanity. Tusev continues his research, initiating a fundamental comment to begin the research topic. He realizes that time has a different value and appreciation depending on the country in which it is located. In other words, in Germany, time will not be as valued as in third world countries like Ecuador (Abban, 2011). It is for this reason that Tusev justifies the development of the survey on the level of punctuality of Ecuadorians. For research, use the discussion group for students of specialties of the University of the Holy Spirit. The research wants to reveal what globalization includes and technological development generates a positive factor for Ecuadorians to change their way of thinking in relation to time. For that. Tusev bases two possibilities on the behavior of Ecuadorian students. Both hypotheses hope to explain that students weigh what is happening in their arrival location, know the importance of arriving early, and seek methods to avoid delay. Qualitative research used as a survey analysis tool. The investigation focused on more than 500 students out of the 5,000 who exist in the university. A favorable point observed in the development of the research introduction is the use of closed and open questions, in which one can determine even the characteristics related to the punctuality of students. Literary reviewFor the revision of concepts, Tusev uses four concepts related to punctuality among people which are culture, perception of time, Ecuador and EHEA. In the case of culture, the author determines that this element plays a fundamental role in determining why people tend to be punctual and punctual. The tradition of unpunctuality that exists among many Latin Americans is well known. When people agree on an appointment and set a time, they always ask themselves one question: what time should you actually arrive? With this they want to ask whether it will start on time or not.It is understood that Salvadoran time is that which begins 30, 40 or 60 minutes later. In the case of Ecuador, Ecuadorian time must always be 30 minutes later (Tusev, 2017). Second term which is the perception of time, the author highlights other concepts like that developed by Juarez and Hernández (2010), in which they determine that time is a fundamental dimension that influences people's perceptions. It is therefore possible that aspects such as actions, plans and events can be organized. Over the years, models have been built to address the perception of time, which differ depending on the type of information used to estimate its rhythm. Another aspect on which people determine their perception of time is the direction and priorities on which attention is paid. paid. For a person, spending more time doing an activity they enjoy most will have a lower perception of time than if they were doing an activity they dislike. The author's perception of time is also based on the family and the place where it is located. For Tusev, considering the term of the word Ecuador is relevant, because it would contain a fundamental characteristic that a large part of the peoples of Latin America present. However, Latin Americans are proficient in the business world and are able to find employment on their own. The truth is that when we talk about punctuality, it seems that the virtue of excellent workers is affected. While it is essential for a person from Europe to be late for a business meeting. For Latin Americans, being late can mean something normal that can be forgiven. In Latin America, time is not considered a resource. Otherwise, only as a means to an end. However, the error that exists in the terms is not starting with an important topic related to the research (Tusev, 2017).MethodologyIn the methodology part, Tusev determines that the research is quantitative, mainly through the use of survey to determine the level of punctuality of students at Université Saint-Esprit. The quantity of the sample, 575 randomly observed students, is also explained. The confidence level is 95% and its margin of error is 10.67%. The normal distribution formula is 50%. ResultsIn the results section, the author determines that 31% and 10% arrive between 5 to 10 minutes late and more than 10 minutes late, respectively. Which determines that the average Holy Spirit University student tends to be late to class. In other words, the survey explains the purpose of the survey and provides summary results that facilitate data analysis. An important point is the fact that the teachers, despite the fact that they reprimand their students, are not all severe with them, since only 17% of them do not allow entry to classes, enforcing the internal regulations of the university. Fifty% of them only give them a warning. The results have no limits and do not give rise to recommendations for future analyses. DiscussionIn the case of discussion, Tusev gives a short explanation of the results obtained. Well, he says that the lateness of the students is the result of the lack of discipline that the teachers apply in respecting the internal regulations, which determine that if a student arrives 10 classes late, he will not be able to enter. The results explained by the author present a correct order, since they start from the most basic result to the most specific. Another factor that Tusev considers important is that the backlogs are a result of the heavy traffic generated in the areas surrounding the university. This is a factor highlighted by students as.