The majority established this rationale by citing Kaisner v. Kolb, McCain V. Florida Power Corps., City of Miami V. Horne and County of Pinellas wrote General Order A-9 as the basis for their reasoning. In these cases, with the exception of General Order A-9, the court's view was that law enforcement officers are liable for injuries caused by their own negligence or failure to comply with the law. standard public safety policy. Individual Opinions: In the dissenting opinion, the minority argued that the majority's decision opens Pandora's box. Arguing that the decision would encourage offenders to flee and, therefore, endanger more innocent bystanders. In addition to this separate opinion from the dissent, several other key arguments from the dissent are presented in bullet point form.