The issue of reform of the United Nations Security Council is as old as the UN itself. Member states have consistently expressed concerns about permanent Council representation and veto power, particularly since the end of the Cold War, by which time global geopolitical realities had clearly changed since 1945. Formal discussions on reform of the UN Security Council began with the establishment in 1993 of the Open-ended Working Group on the Question of Equitable Representation and Increase in the Membership of the Security Council and Other Issues Related to the Security Council. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why violent video games should not be banned"? Get the original essay After more than a decade of work by the Task Force, member states decided in September 2007 to move discussions to a intergovernmental negotiation process (IGN). The Gabonese delegation echoes Decision 62/557 of 2008, which defined the parameters of the IGN, the five key issues under study in these negotiations are: the categories of members of the Council (i.e. (say permanent, non-permanent or third party). option), the question of regional representation, the size of an enlarged council and working methods, the relationship between the Council and the General Assembly. Gabon firmly believes that it is vital to ensure that multilateralism guarantees collective security and inclusion. Africa represents the largest geographic group at the UN and issues relating to the continent remain the bulk of the Council's agenda. Any future Security Council reform must ensure that Africa has a permanent seat. This is an integral part of aspirations for true democracy of global political and economic governance. The Common Position of Gabon and Africa aims to expand the Security Council in the category of permanent and non-permanent members, to improve its working methods and to grant new permanent members the same prerogatives and privileges as those of members current permanent positions, including the right of veto. Gabon believes that equitable representation requires increasing the number of members of the Security Council from fifteen to twenty-six, the eleven additional seats being distributed as follows where two permanent seats and two (additional) non-permanent seats are reserved for African States, two permanent seats and one non-permanent seat are reserved for the States of Asia, one non-permanent seat is reserved for the States of Eastern Europe, one permanent seat and one non-permanent seat are reserved for the States of Latin America and the Caribbean and a permanent seat is reserved for Western European and other States. .Keep in mind: This is just a sample.Get a personalized article now from our expert writers.Get a custom essayThe lack of legitimacy of the Council is a cancer eating away at all institutions of the United Nations system in its entirety. Power is changing, but not in the Security Council, where the victors of a war fought 70 years ago make all the important decisions. We cannot let this reform effort fail because of power politics..