blog




  • Essay / Arguments for and against the use of torture on suspected terrorists

    Table of contentsIntroductionCounterargumentMy argumentConclusionIntroductionTorture is an insidious practice and has been defined as an act through which intense pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person. for purposes such as obtaining information or confessions. U.S. courts have consistently condemned the use of torture by government authorities to obtain information from criminal suspects because it violates due process. The use of torture to extract information from terrorists suspected of having valuable knowledge about future attacks is the subject of intense and ongoing debate. Although torture is illegal, it can still prevent even greater harm. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayTorture is illegal under both the United States Constitution and international law, but many officials believe it is considered an effective method for gathering crucial knowledge or information. information. The policy of whether or not to torture suspected terrorists must be evaluated on whether it is in the public's best interest. The United States uses torture against terrorists or anyone suspected of being a terrorist. The United States is part of CAT, an anti-torture convention program that ensures that all acts of torture constitute violations of criminal law. However, the United States has found ways around this problem and the Geneva Convention. The United States will send suspected terrorists to other countries and torture them there, or pretend it does not use torture; rather, it is an intense interrogation practice. I disagree with the idea that suspected terrorists should be tortured. Counterargument There have been allegations that military officials obtained valuable information from suspected terrorists through torture. When it is in the public interest in a situation where there is immediate danger, then it is reasonable to resort to the method of torture. The government makes decisions by balancing the value of one life against many, because the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. If there is a large population, life is immediately in danger, and the suspect has been captured, there is reason to resort to torture. Torture is used with the intention of creating favorable conditions for a successful interrogation, that is, to break a person's will. Many agencies claim that torture is an effective tool for obtaining valuable information and this is used to justify illegal actions that the United States chooses to practice. Ultimately, it is argued that saving the lives of many people justifies the use of torture. Torture is inhumane, dehumanizing and illegal under the Constitution and international law; it should therefore not be practiced in any country. There are other forms of interrogation and other means of extracting information from suspected terrorists. Torture is an unethical and intense approach to attempting to extract information from someone who is only suspected of being a terrorist. Torture is illegal under the law and every detainee is not the person sought and may not have any information. Unless there is immediate danger and millions of lives are at risk, the use of torture should not be.