blog




  • Essay / Evaluating Mark Lawrence Atwood's Views Regarding the Battle of Vietnam

    The Vietnam WarMark Lawrence Atwood is currently Director of Graduate Studies at the Clements Center for National Security in Austin, University of Texas. Associate Professor of History and Distinguished Fellow of the Roberts Strauss Center for International Law and Security. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayMark Atwood received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Stanford University in 1988 and received his doctorate from Yale in 1999. Since After joining the University of Texas, Department of History in 2000, the author published two history books: The Vietnam War: A Concise International History (2008) and Shouldering the Burden: Europe and American involvement in the war in Vietnam (2005). In this history book, Mark Lawrence spans centuries of effort in this small southeastern country. The author begins with the Trung sisters' struggle in the 1st century to initiate Chinese rule, to describe how America, from the Vietnamese perspective, was now another in a long line of ultimately overwhelmed enemies. The author finds Sister Trung's divine heir in Ho Chi Minh, a socialist activist who declared independence only to find himself battling an American-backed South Vietnamese uprising. This book resists its accessible presentation and brief nature, although it generally contains little information regarding the other main players in the "war", China, the Soviet Union, and France; By far a US-centric story, the narrative is based on major events in the United States, from the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution in 1964 to the fall of the US embassy in 1975. The author shines by describing how Johnson Lyndon, followed by Nixon, then Kissinger, struggled in vain. look for an acceptable reason to withdraw. With a validation that modern readers find familiar, all three leaders repeatedly emphasized that withdrawing without a victory would bring shame before the world and strengthen their enemies. In the book, Lawrence points out that ultimately the opposite happened and that America's popularity declined the more Americans fought. Even more so, neither communism nor North Vietnam prospered after the withdrawal from the Americas. The author points out that the opposite happened. The United States' popularity plunged as it fought in the war, and subsequently recovered. Neither North Vietnam nor communism prospered after their withdrawal. Additionally, the book specifically considers the short- and long-term origins of the battle. The author analyzes the growth of Vietnamese communism in the early 20th century and shows how the Cold War unrest of the 1940s and early 1950s set the United States on a path to intervention. Certainly, the book mainly covers the "American War," which ranges from the overthrow of South Vietnamese President Diem Dinh, to the odious effects of Tet on American public judgment, to Richard's expansion of the war into Laos and Cambodia. Nixon, through Lyndon's withdrawal. of the 1968 presidential race and the difficult 1973 peace agreement that ultimately concluded with U.S. military participation. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Conclusion The book examines the difficult outcome of The battle is a lasting legacy in American films, books, and political discussions, in addition to Vietnam's struggle against intense tribulations..