On the question of whether or not globalization presents a new field of opportunities, I would like to begin by examining a text that I reviewed earlier in this essay entitled “A place for yourself”. own: schooling and the formation of identities in modern Nepal" by Stephen Carney and Ulla Ambrosius Madsen, as well as the text "Culture and consumer identities in Kathmandu: playing with your brain" by Mark Liechty. The first text presents the opportunity to move away from the historically constructed social classes, placement of individuals in the family and the development of their identity, through education and school activities in modern Nepal. I believe that globalization plays an important role in education. because it creates new opportunities for individuals to find work, earn money and take more control of their future. This also benefits the rest of the world, in the case of job creation and a. better economy, which develops the different industries and a globalized world Education is also mentioned as one of the new ideologies in the second text I presented, which talks about the evolution of consumer culture in Kathmandu. This second text also mentions that class and goods become a factor in constructed social classes. So, even though education is seen in some parts of the world as a way to move forward in life and break with the social and historical hierarchy, consumer culture and the effects of material goods have the power to immediately put you back in life. a socially constructed caste. This aspect of globalization can be seen as a new way of structuring old inequalities. That said, I continue to believe that education offers an extraordinary new field of opportunity, particularly in those parts of the world where each middle of paper ......researcher undertakes their analysis. In the case of European ethnographers who studied Third World Africans, Asians, or other people of color, and early American ethnographers who studied American Indians from the perspective of the conqueror, this creates a sense of hierarchy, as this can place the researcher in a difficult situation. the higher-ranking observer position of their research object. In this particular case, it empowers the “white man” and places the “non-white man” in a lower caste in global society. My central point of the pitfalls of the ethnographic tradition has been the possibility of separation from society in this particular research method. Some of the examples I have looked at go back many years, but present a picture of a separation we should be wary of in a modern globalized world and the pitfalls an ethnographic researcher should be aware of..