blog




  • Essay / The Use of Psycho and Citizen Kane in Examining Parenting Styles

    Society desires the ability to make its own decisions. Whether through free will or the freedom to make choices based on prior experiences without restriction, the idea of ​​self-control over the events that occur is valuable. However, Psycho and Citizen Kane argue that our lives are dictated entirely by our parents and that the very earliest experiences humans have are those that shape and direct us the most. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Citizen Kane begins the story with his childhood itself, in which he is happily sledding in the background during that his parents are talking about sending him away with Thatcher for a good education and a generous amount of money. This deep focus allows us to experience dramatic irony as they quickly sign the papers after hearing about the financial deal, while Kane plays ignorantly and blissfully. Charles Foster Kane's mother tells him as he is fired that he "could be the richest man in the world...". From the beginning, money drives the story forward, and Charles's most famous and dearest people in the middle of isolated Colorado, as evidenced by the blizzard blowing around their home with no one else in sight. This shows that from his birth until his death, Charles Kane was surrounded by money and people who were obsessed with it. The blatant accumulation of statues, the construction of Xanadu and its extravagant parties were a clear example of his materialism. However, perhaps the most psychologically interesting part of Citizen Kane is Susan Alexander's review, which states that she does not want to be bought with money, but rather to go out and have fun. She implies that Kane's use of money was never about living a happier life, but rather a "better life." In his attempt to show his love to Susan, this amounts to trying to buy her love and mirrors the way Kane's parents sold their love and connection to Kane for money. His only way of showing affection is the one he has learned all his life, as shown in the flashbacks of Christmas with Thatcher and the number of shares he received from Thatcher. There was never a memory where they really seemed to enjoy each other's company, as he was never really Kane's father, but more of a business partner to him. Kane was angry with him for depriving him of the life he could have had with his parents. It is unreasonable to say that Kane felt no love for Susan, as he particularly enjoyed her company because she liked him even though he did not know he was a media mogul. However, he couldn't please her by trying to help her realize her dream of becoming a singer by building an opera house. The idea that Charles Foster Kane is a hollow character is completely false, as his character has been so psychologically complex since his childhood and thus leads to his emptiness as a human being. The apparently contradictory ideas about his death and his last words in “Rosebud”, an allusion to his childhood, at the very beginning of the film, undoubtedly refer to the end of his emotions. However, he realizes that his wife's departure and the loneliness he felt began at the very beginning of his life, and that is why he begins the story with this. He was dead from the start and incapable of being "human" to his first and second wives. The psychopath and early life portrait of “Mother” are evident in Norman Bates and his attitude.