Feminism, as defined by Merriam-Webster, is the theory of political, economic, and social equality of the sexes, as well as organized activity in the name of rights and the interests of women. . Feminism is obviously predominant in the 21st century and its working population is increasing in number. The reason behind this is none other than the integration of technology and innovation in the field of communication; people are more connected and social than ever before thanks to the wonders of the internet, primarily social media and networking sites, and feminists are no exception to this. These feminists then brought awareness to the world using the World Wide Web, and this has been very effective, reshaping modern media and aspects in different forms, and one of these aspects is art. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay As early as the 1960s, this movement called the feminist art movement, women wanted to have the same rights and opportunities as men in the new progressive world. Not only did the corporate world feel this movement, but so did the art world, as it was a medium for women artists to express their thoughts and reflect the lives and experiences of women through different fields of art. Since contemporary arts were already emerging at the time of the movement, they were free to express themselves on open and bold topics, being able to influence many women at the time and even flourished in the 1970s, what we call the second wave of feminism. Even according to Strick, the director of the Museum of Contemporary Art in Los Angeles declared that it has been called "the most influential international movement of all those of the post-war period." Soon after, feminist population around the world, especially in Asia and Africa, emerged in large numbers due to the popularity of contemporary art. This has been the general status of the feminist art movement since then, it is still present but barely active in art exhibitions and in the hearts of feminist artists. This was not the case with the Philippine feminist movement; ours was different from another country, there was no need for a feminist movement in this country since from a pre-Spanish era when local communities were led predominantly by women, and even today, according to Guzman de Quora, the current Filipino population does not. no problem having a female president. Even though some people have problems with these female presidents, it's not because they are women. The Philippines also ranks highest among Asian countries on the Global Gender Gap Index, implying that the Philippines is an egalitarian state, with equal rights and opportunities, from education to education. 'job. So basically the idea is that feminism is not that intense here in the country. In the Philippines, even though there are still feminist groups present in the country like the Gabriela Women's Party, this does not change the fact that feminism is not that strong in the country since both men and women were already established to have equal rights and opportunities. before the 1500s. As feminism is not that intense in the Philippines, the feminist art movement was also tiny in the country, but female artists in different fields of art increased in number alongside men. It was the contemporary period of the country where everyone is free to express themselves. and reflect their thoughts through any media of their choice, such as theater, music, literature, visual arts, etc.During this period, many artists contributed to the development of the Philippine arts, in which in return, they were recognized by the entire nation, by the people and the government, in which an order, administered by the Cultural Center of Philippines by virtue of Proclamation No. 1001 of President Ferdinand Marcos dated April 2, 1972 and by the National Commission on Culture and the Arts, was inducted as the National Artists of the Philippines. The order includes the categories in which an artist may be originally recognized, namely music, dance, theater, visual arts, literature, film and broadcasting, and architecture. Since his induction, men and women who have made significant contributions to the development of the Philippine arts have been awarded the order. The National Artists Award is entirely opportunistic for both men and women, provided one contributes deeply to the country. they will have the chance to be nominated and the probability of being awarded the order. But speculating deeply on the sentence, there are cases or observations where injustice between men and women was present, with most men being biased by the sentence or vice versa, and these cases are condensed into three. These three speculated cases or observations are as follows: the population of female national artists and certain categories of the national artist award are predominantly dominated by men or women; the possibility of presidential bias toward men or women, or vice versa, regarding the National Artist Award; and the cases of Nora Aunor, Vilma Santos, Rodolfo Vera Quizon Sr. and Anita Magsaysay-Ho. These three speculations focus on the issues of gender equality in the National Artists Award, the case of feminism in the awarding of National Artists in the Philippines. The purpose of this critical article is to criticize, analyze and evaluate the speculations on the low population of women and the domination of men and women of certain categories in the National Artists Prize, the possible appearance of presidential prejudices between men and women in the nomination, deliberation and proclamation of the National Artist Award, and finally, the cases of the four talented artists who have never been recognized as national artists in the Philippines. With these three speculations, put together with researched facts and information, and added to the author's critical analysis and evaluation, the sneaky question of feminism in the National Artist Award can finally be opened and expanded so that the general public can see it, evaluating it on their own vision. own, depending on whether the problem is benign or unfavorable to the development of the arts in the Philippines. There is an unbalanced problem in the national artist population between men and women, and the problem is only exposed by digging deeper into the award categories. The categories are very crucial in the National Artist Award so that the artist is properly recognized in the field in which he is proficient. There are certain cases in which the sexes are sometimes correlated with the stereotype, for example dancing is particularly reserved for women, or architecture is particularly reserved for men, etc. This is a widespread concept in today's society and there is no doubt that this is also present in the National Artist Award. Out of 65 Philippine National Artists, only ten of them are female National Artists. Statistically, it is estimated that only 15% of national artists are women. The percentage is so low that it does not even reach half or even a quarter of the total number of national artists. It is even more speculated that four national artistsout of ten females, or 40%, are recognized and conferred in the field of dance, which only skews the stereotype that women are special or destined for dance. Other categories in which some national female artists were recognized were in music and theater, fields in which most women are also particularly active, especially here in the Philippine context. Only Edith L. Tiempo broke this stereotype when she was named a National Artist in the literature category in 1999 and is the only female National Artist awarded outside of the field of dance, theater and music. Not only domestic women artists have these problems, but men do too. If women dominate in dance, men dominate in the visual arts, cinema and especially architecture categories. We can thus conclude that men dominated the National Artists prize, it is estimated that 85% of the members of the Order of National Artists are men. Like Edith L. Tiempo, one man also broke the stereotype, namely Ramon Obusan, the only man to be recognized in the dance category and the only one of the five national artists to be awarded in the dance category since. the other four are all women. According to the National Commission for Culture and the Arts, he was a dancer, choreographer, set designer and artistic director and also achieved phenomenal success in Filipino dance and cultural work. These speculations do not imply that men and women are only recognized in what society thinks men and women should be particular about, it implies that there is still a shortage of male and female artists who can contribute to the development of Philippine arts in different fields. branches of art. People should never doubt what they are good at, even if society perceives it as different because of their gender designation. Break the stereotype and be like Edith Tiempo and Ramon Obusan, an exception in their specialized fields, but who have been recognized and awarded as a national artist because of it. Even though men have dominated the National Artist Award compared to women, the award is open to all and in the future, and it may change due to the prevalence of feminism throughout the country. Another observation, two national female artists are rewarded. because they got a head start thanks to the publicity that their husbands were national artists. These two females are Daisy Avellana and Honorata “Atang” Dela Rama. It's really strange that they were years apart from their husbands. Daisy Avellana and Lamberto Avellana were the co-founders of the Barangay Theater Guild which paved the way for the popularization of theater and dramatic arts in the country, using radio and television, but they were still spaced 23 years, Daisy being in 1999 and Lamberto in 1976. Atang Dela Rama and Amado Hernández, on the other hand, are still far apart as to their dates of appointment, Hernández being in 1973 and his wife in 1987, at 14 one of the other. The four artists mentioned are all very talented, but sometimes the awards can be skewed and not noticed until a decade later, thus only supporting the problem of female discrimination present in the awards. In some cases, there may be bias on the part of the president. since the president has the power to remove or add candidates for the award. Even if there is no record of this happening even once, it is a possibility and it is just a major flaw in the deliberation process of national artists. A much better solution is to exclude the president from the deliberation process but must beincluded in the proclamation process because the President is a very influential person in the country and can contribute to the recognition of Filipino artists. There have actually been issues where the President himself removed a candidate from the national entertainer shortlist for unknown or just plain insane reasons. Here are some of the mysterious reasons for the removal of RAMON SANTOS. Ramon Santos was removed from the shortlist of nominees in May 2009, and four male artists were added to the nominations for the title via "president's prerogative", meaning the president has his biases on who the national artists will be during his reign as president. of the country. Of course, this question ballooned, eventually technically awarding all four artists, but the proclamation was later rescinded. The impeachment of Ramon Santos still remains a mystery to this day, with some speculation that he was removed by the Malacañang, or possibly requested from Arroyo herself. Although the reasons are unknown, it is reasonable that Ramon Santos deserves this award for his musical contributions. The impeachment of NORA AUNOR by President Aquino. This was one of the most incredible cases of an artist being removed from the nomination. According to Aquino de Lozada and Sabillo's story in Inquirer.net, he states that "Sa aking pananaw yung national artiste binibigyan natin ng honor na ito, puri na ito ay malaki ang ambag sa lahing Pilipino at dapat tularan", he is true of his statement however that national artists should be honored and should be seen as a role model for others. He then said: “Ang naging problema ko lang dun ay alam naman natin lahat…naconvict po sya sa drug”, this was a direct attack on Nora Aunor. He then sweetened the statement, marveling at the superstar's talent and life story. Despite the admiration, Aquino later gave a strong verdict about Aunor, saying, "If I made her a national artist, how would she be a role model?" Many people, especially fans of the Superstar, were furious with Aquino's statement. This was an insane conviction coming from Aquino himself. The National Artist is an award given to individuals who have contributed significantly to the development of the Philippine arts, not a drug-free artist award. Aquino focused too much on the “being a role model” part of the award that he forgot the purpose of the award in the first place. Nora Aunor is a wonderful and talented female artist, she deserves an award for her great contribution to the country, and she can be a great role model as an artist, not a role model of an ex-drug addict like Aquino does. see it. The issue was infuriating but it calmed down right after, and Aunor was heartbroken by Aquino's statement but overwhelmed by the love from her fans. The good news is that Aunor was automatically listed in the shortlist of nominees for this year's National Artist Award 2018, according to Rappler's Villano. Humans tend to have biases and this is deeply ingrained in us, along with the fact that humans also tend to have preconceived judgments or biases. It's not that bad, it helps us survive as a species, but when it comes to awards and titles like the National Artists Award and many more, it's now called unfair . The deliberation system for the National Artist Award has a huge flaw, namely the inclusion of only one person, the president, who is prone to bias and prejudice. The appropriate solution: change the system and choose a more appropriate system that cannot be decided by one person at any stage of the deliberation. Keep in mind: this is just one, 71(1),