In 1763, the Treaty of Paris was signed and the Seven Years' War ended. While it was supposed to be a time of celebration, many issues were actually brewing beneath the surface. In the Seven Years' War, Britain emerged victorious, but it was also buried under debts accumulated during the war. Weary and tired of the last war, Britain wanted to avoid any future conflict with the Indians and French and issued the Royal Proclamation of 1763. Although this solution may seem simple, it also increased the costs of administering the colonies. The new prime minister began to see that US tariffs were less than 1% of the estimated amount. To pay its debts and increase tax revenue, Britain began enforcing its laws more strictly and raising taxes. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Although it seemed reasonable for the Thirteen Colonies to contribute and repay the debts of their mother country, the opinions of the colonists differed. During the Seven Years' War, the colonists believed that Britain was not providing enough military support and left them to fend for themselves during the war. However, Britain suddenly decided to enforce its laws and taxes after the war, as the colonists were struggling with their own debts. The British, however, thought differently on the matter because they had a heavier tax burden. Although the American colonists had a low tax burden, they continued to protest, leading to different views on taxation. This puts the Americans and the British on two separate paths that would lead to a future collision. In 1765, Britain was still trying to raise money to station an army in North America, so it decided to pass the Stamp Act. However, soon after the Stamp Act was passed, American settlers responded with violent protests. riots and the collectors were forced to resign. The colonists believed their actions were justified by the principle "No taxation without representation." They thought their colonial assembly was similar to Parliament because they were represented and already had to pay taxes. But now the UK government also wants him to add another tax to that? Plus, they thought it was an unrepresentative tax? Of course, they didn't want that and so they fought back fiercely. The British government, however, had a different opinion. They claimed that colonists could “enjoy” the luxurious choice of having representation, but other British subjects could not. Why should American colonists be treated differently from other British subjects? There are other Britons who have no say in Parliament, but they do not oppose the Stamp Act. Despite the British government's arguments, they later repealed the Stamp Act, but this only quieted the protests for a while. When the Townshend Act was passed, it was a little different from the Stamp Act. Before the Stamp Act was repealed, American colonists debated whether it was a “direct tax.” Britain therefore believed that the American colonists would not be able to argue when they taxed imported goods. Because surely imported goods aren't a direct tax, right? This was false, the Americans believed that Great Britain had the right to tax the colonies, and they believed that the.