In the following paragraphs, I will provide a critique of the quantitative article titled Hospital Nurses' Perception of the Geriatric Nurses' Practice Environment geriatric nurses (Boltz, 2008). The details below will be based on the criteria presented to us for consideration in the Step-by-Step Guide to Critical Research – Part 1: Quantitative Research (Coughlin, 2007). These guidelines have provided me with the basis to properly critique this article in all its aspects. The review will include the following: Title, hypothesis, research design, introduction, method, results, and overall view of the entire article. Each part should be critiqued individually and then combined as a whole. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get an original essayWhen you review the title of the article Hospital Nurses' Perception of the Geriatric Nurses' Practice Environment published in the Journal of Nursing Scholarship of 2008 (Boltz, 2008 ), I believe this title clearly states the purpose of the information provided in the article and gives clear guidance as to what will be covered in the article. The title is clear and concise and would provide appropriate results for nurses searching for an article on this topic. I believe the author has appropriately achieved the standards of a well-written title in his article. The authors listed for this article have clearly provided information as to their qualifications for the basis of writing this article and their ability to correctly gather the information required for this type of research article. Although we have learned that the merits of the article cannot simply be assumed to be correct based on the author's credentials, we can use them to develop a sense of their experience and how it relates to the topic presented. These authors appear to have the appropriate qualification and experience necessary for this article to be accepted as accurate and worthy of research use. In reviewing the summary the authors provided for this article, I do not believe it provides enough meaningful information to properly inform me of the content of the article and the path the article takes. The summary, when read, does not provide enough meaning to determine whether this article is capable of providing me with sufficient information and background on the subject addressed by the title. With a few more sentences, I think the author could significantly improve the article summary and attract more nurses, readers and researchers to his article which might contain useful information for their research regarding the environment of geriatric nurses in the hospital. the hypothesis of the quantitative research article is closely related to the abstract and can sometimes be interchangeable in one way or another when providing information to the researcher or reader, this article does not use a hypothesis clear and due to the nature of the short, condensed summary I do not believe that this category of criticism has been met or framed correctly in this article. With the shortened abstract, I believe there is a need for a more in-depth hypothesis to provide the reader, researcher, and nurse with additional information for quick, condensed reading to determine if this article can provide insight useful for their required use. The article hypothesis should provide a general overview of what is included in the article and what can be learned byreading or using the article for research purposes. One of the most vital parts of any type of article, but especially for a quantitative research article, is that regarding the research design used to formulate and develop the article, and affects how and by whom it can be used to gain knowledge about the topic being researched. Too often it is found that authors do not give full thought to how their article will be used and how this affects the research design and method that would be most useful in providing the end user with the information in the format in which they needs. In this article, research and findings were collected from responses submitted by direct care registered nurses in settings providing care to geriatric patients. However, it is unclear whether these responses came from nurses who actually provided care to geriatric patients or whether they were simply exposed to care for geriatric patients. the environment in the establishment. Research for this piece was also gathered through secondary analysis of data collected from the Hartford Institute at New York University. Based on the data provided for this facility, it is unclear whether NYU Hartford Institute provides geriatric care or has geriatric nurses on staff. While I find the type of research collected is appropriate for this type of study and the direct responses can certainly provide insight into nurses' perceptions regarding the geriatric nursing practice environment, I would be curious to 'have information on how many of these nurses have actually provided geriatric care or have simply been exposed to the environment since their assigned facility provides this type of care. I believe that information on the perception of geriatric care can vary greatly depending on whether it comes from a nurse who actually provides this type of care or those who have only been exposed to the geriatric care environment. The methodologies used in the preparation of the article appear to be based on the reading should be thorough and the information provided supports the information contained in the article. However, reading the information regarding the methodologies used, I feel like it is a bit confusing and might not be completely understood if someone used this article without having direct contact with the type of geriatric environment which is in question. The methodologies used in the study appear to offer a wide range of types and should be adequate to provide research studies and quantify accurate data in all aspects of geriatric nursing. This assessment also takes into account the ethical element related to the information provided in the research article and how collection practices were handled to ensure an ethical balance between providing large amounts of information while maintaining the The ethical requirement that no harm to patients or nurses was committed during the collection of the required data and that all HIPPA requirements were met during the evaluation and analysis of the secondary data collected from nurses on the geriatric environment. While it is obvious that this article is intended solely to provide nurses' perception of the geriatric nursing environment in a facility, it is necessary to realize that this type of information has or would have involved care or observationpatients treated. on the geriatric floor of the establishment. Based on the credentials of the authors and those involved who provided data for the completion of this article, I believe that they would be sufficiently familiar with the necessary procedures to ensure that all ethical components were followed. The article appears to use non-compliance with ethical criteria. - a type of experimental design research to expand on the information and provide for the possibility of further research and additional articles based on the preliminary information that has been analyzed and segmented to provide the research in the article, could also be evaluated in more detail and provide more in-depth research. This type of research also makes it possible to compare the relationships between nurses and how they perceive geriatric nursing care in their establishments. Their opinions, even if not stated directly in the article, may lead them to compare their observations and opinions about the typical nursing environment and the similarities and differences between "normal" nursing and the "geriatric" nursing environment. . The article also contains information that clearly explains to users that “measuring the influence of organizational support on patient outcomes” is not included in the data presented. including satisfaction and clinical measures. Although I realize that in research articles we cannot always provide research and information in all areas associated with the topic covered in this article, I feel that this type of feedback and research is crucial to provide a comprehensive picture of nurses' perceptions of the geriatric nursing environment. It is also discussed that there may be a bias presented in the article as to which facilities provide high quality geriatric care, in their opinion, versus those which may not have been perceived as providing the highest level of care to geriatric patients (Boltz, 2007). While we are all aware as humans that these types of biases exist when sampling opinions, it is necessary to ensure that these types of issues are addressed appropriately in our research and that we are able to solidify the information provided in our research to not include these types of statistics. Overall, the article provided a good overview of nurses' opinions regarding the geriatric nursing environment. Based on the data presented and information provided by the author, questions were raised as to whether the opinions criticized in the article would be influenced based on the nurse's level of knowledge and the environment of care geriatrics and whether the influence was equally or not. requested based on the establishment where the nurse practiced and/or witnessed geriatric care provided to patients. I think more detailed information needs to be provided on the criteria and questions presented to nurses in the data was collected by the Hartford Institute at New York University. We do not know exactly what level of nurses were interviewed, what questions were asked, and whether they had direct contact with geriatric patients. Although the author may assume that the reader, researcher, and/or nurse may form some of their own hypotheses based on the information provided in the article, this type of article, in my opinion, is intended to provide information that can be used as stand-alone research. and are not open to.