-
Essay / Universal Human Rights: An Essential Element for Dignity and Equality
Table of ContentsIntroductionHuman Rights (Essay)ConclusionIntroductionThis essay on human rights highlights the fact that common freedoms are inherent to all humans and are not granted by the state, and emphasizes the different sets of key principles and values that define human rights, as well as the important work of non-governmental organizations in the promotion and protection of these rights in Lebanon. Common freedoms are rights that we have essentially in light of the fact that we exist as a people – they are not authorized by any state. These widely held rights are innate in each of us, regardless of our identity, gender, public or ethnic origin, color, religion, language or other status. They range from the most essential - the privilege of life - to those that make the daily routine worth experiencing, for example the rights to food, education, work, well-being and freedom. Human rights follow many sets of principles such as universality, inalienability, indivisibility, interdependence and interdependence. There are many key human rights values such as respect, dignity, equality, responsibility and freedom. In Lebanon, there are many non-governmental organizations that work in various ways to promote and protect human rights. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get the original essay Human Rights (Essay) This part of the essay on human rights focuses on the he universality, inalienability, indivisibility and interdependence of fundamental freedoms, which are essential to the dignity of each human individual and cannot be ordered or denied hierarchically without compromising the enjoyment of other rights. Human rights are universal in that everyone is born with and enjoys similar rights, regardless of where they live, their sexual orientation or race, or their strict social or ethnic foundations. Inalienable since the privileges of individuals can never be taken away. Indivisible whether they identify with common, cultural, financial, political or social issues, fundamental freedoms are natural to the dignity of each human individual. Thus, all common freedoms have an equivalent status, and cannot be located in requests at different levels. The denial of a right constantly hinders happiness regarding the various rights. In this way, everyone's privilege to a satisfactory lifestyle cannot be called into question to the detriment of different rights, for example the privilege to well-being or the privilege to training. Interdependent and interdependent because each contributes to the recognition of the human respect of an individual through the satisfaction of their formative, physical, mental and profound demands. The satisfaction of one right often depends, entirely or to some extent, on the satisfaction of others. For example, satisfaction of the privilege of well-being may depend, under particular conditions, on satisfaction of the privilege of advancement, training, or data. Equal and non-discriminatory, all human beings are equal as individuals and by the rightness of the inalienable pride of each human individual. No one should tolerate separation based on race, identity, gender, age, language, sexual orientation, etc., as provided for in the Fundamental Freedoms Guidelines. Two of the key qualitieswhich are central to the idea of human rights are human dignity and equality. Human rights can be seen as characterizing the essential principles that are fundamental to the existence of the nobility; and their completeness comes from the fact that in this respect, in any case, all men are equivalent. We should not and cannot make separation between them. These two beliefs, or qualities, are actually all that is necessary to embrace the possibility of common freedoms, and these beliefs are not really in doubt. This is why common freedoms are defended by every culture on the planet, every socialized government and every major religion. It is generally accepted that state power cannot be unlimited or assertive; it should in any case be limited to the extent that all people within its parish can live with certain basic necessities for human respect. Many different qualities can arise from these two principles and can help define how, in practice, individuals and societies should coexist. For example, the freedom, since human will is an important element of human dignity, to be obliged to accomplish something without wanting to denigrate the human soul. In addition, respect, because the absence of respect towards someone neglects to value their distinction and fundamental dignity. Moreover, responsibility, with regard to the privileges of others, implies a duty with regard to one's activities and efforts for the recognition of the rights of each person. educational causes, women's shelters, social affiliations, strict associations, legitimate institutions, humanitarian aid programs - and the list could go on - to huge global associations with hundreds or even thousands of branches or individuals in various regions of the world. This reality makes them of crucial importance for those who wish to contribute to the improvement of fundamental freedoms on the planet. They can protect and promote human rights by providing information, they work at the local level and are the ones who know the problem of these individuals in its roots better than the government. They play a fundamental role in transmitting data to the government alongside the human-driven agreement. Teaching about “human rights” issues contributes to improving the conditions for fundamental freedoms without anyone else, because individuals know their privileges and thus increase their chances of asserting them. Lobbying, hiring extraordinary leaders to assess the interests of undervalued individuals and influence the government to change its courtesy towards society at large. Provide assistance, striving to provide legal aid to weak networks that do not understand privilege and cannot bear the cost of legitimate administrations for monetary, social, or other reasons. It is common to worry about compassionate aid and common freedoms NGOs. Eliminate social problems and health problems, assume a vital role in monitoring illegal logging, avoid HIV/AIDS, give instructions to educate and prepare weak individuals, take care of children, give advice identified with medical problems, advance laws and rules on fundamental freedoms among individuals from near to focal level. Finally forming a bridge between the government and the local people, as discussed earlier, NGOs are the main factor who can easily access nearby individuals and understand their problems deeply. Generally, they undermine and weaken the power of,.