blog




  • Essay / South China Sea Disputes

    The South China Sea disputes involve island and maritime claims between multiple sovereign states. An estimated $5 trillion in global trade passes through the South China Sea, and many non-claimant states want the South China Sea to remain international waters. The disputes focus on islands, reefs, shoals and other features in the South China Sea, including the Spratly Islands, Paracel Islands and various borders of the Gulf of Tonkin. The claimant states wish to retain or acquire rights to fishing grounds, exploration and potential exploitation of crude oil and natural gas in the seabeds of various parts of the South China Sea, as well as strategic control of important navigation routes. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why violent video games should not be banned"?Get the original essay Saudi Arabia believes there is no doubt that the Chinese almost unanimously support their government's official position on South China Sea, as evidenced by the storm of social protests. media comments shortly after the award ceremony. Furthermore, China's position is also welcomed and understood. According to the Chinese government and media, nearly 100 parties from more than 60 countries have declared their support for China's position on the South China Sea issue, and Saudi Arabia is among them. Saudi Arabia believes that most American media and think tanks have not yet understood what "China's position" means. In our opinion, China's position on the South China Sea issue can be interpreted as follows: China does not participate in the arbitration, nor does it accept, recognize or implement the award. China adheres to peaceful negotiations and settlement of the South China Sea dispute. While disputes should be resolved by parties directly concerned in accordance with the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea (DOC), China will work with ASEAN countries to maintain peace and stability in this region. . ad hoc) the arbitral tribunal is not part of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) or the International Court of Justice (ICJ). It does not have jurisdiction to hear territorial conflicts, which constitute the heart of arbitration. The arbitration procedure itself is flawed. Thus, the award is not legally binding nor does it represent international law. The delegate of Saudi Arabia would therefore like to propose some preventive measures that could be effective in overcoming the consequences as quickly as possible: Solution measures It is important first of all to recognize the fact that the conflict in the South China Sea is very asymmetrical and therefore cannot be treated symmetrically. China is undoubtedly a superpower in the region and the Philippines, Vietnam and other contenders are just smaller states. Therefore, it is impossible to hope for a fair solution that treats all participants equally. Everything must be proportionate. ASEAN countries must learn to work with the regional hegemon, China, in a proportionately mutually beneficial manner. Citing international law or forcing China to accept the ASEAN Code of Conduct proposal is indeed unfair to this superpower. The realist school of thought would be more honest and support China's higher position in every negotiation. The only thing ASEAN countries can do, if they really want to unite.