The event of November 24 in Brussels can indeed be considered a turning point for the future development of our country. The partnership agreement signed between the Republic of Armenia and the European Union gives a new direction to the foreign policy of the Republic of Armenia, making it more meaningful and versatile. At least that's your first impression. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essayNowadays there is a lot of talk about this document, it is discussed in various circles. There is no shortage of opinions and I would not want to go much beyond the details of the agreement. My goal is different. Try to analyze the perspectives that may open up before our country after the signing of this document, and which are of paramount importance, in the interest of the European Union. I think you will agree that in the 21st century there is no altruistic motivation for signing an intergovernmental agreement. This should benefit both parties, that's an axiom. Anyway, the most pleasant achievement for Armenia is, first of all, that our state has good prospects for developing horizontal contacts with EU member states in political, economic and other fields. I believe that establishing partnership relations on such a platform will create additional opportunities, first of all, to make pro-Armenian approaches to the Artsakh issue more attractive to European countries. Personally, I consider this to be one of the most important results. And above all, this document concerns the improvement of the economic situation in Armenia, the promotion of human rights and the formation of civil society through legislative reforms, as well as the simplification of entry visas. Besides, on this subject, I have a question. Is this reserved for Armenian citizens? And if this is not the case, are we ready to welcome the potential increase in human flows of “new” Germans or French towards Armenia? As for cooperation in other areas. Regarding the prospects for rapid development of the Armenian economy, I would also like to be very cautious. Let us not forget that the majority of EU countries are going through a deep economic crisis and are having serious difficulties finding new consumer markets. In this case, to what extent they will undertake measures aimed at the development of the economy of our country, I leave the analysis to the reader. Moreover, we are also not talking about Ukraine, nor about the example of Moldova, nor about Georgia, which is comparable to Armenia in many parameters and, first of all, comparable in terms of level of economic development and priorities. Predictions that Moldovan or Georgian fruits, vegetables and wines could conquer the European market in a blitzkrieg were exaggerated to say the least. And at the last Brussels meeting in Ukraine, they clearly explained that the next three cuts, or 600 million euros, would only be made after the kyiv-Brussels reforms and compliance with their commitments. In this regard, it will be interesting to reread the agreement and discover, for example, the imperative nature of the closure of the Metsamor nuclear power plant. There may be one area where our expectations are certainly high. My point is about legal reforms. Today we see what kind of pressure liberal Europe has to put on traditional Armenia, to put it mildly, to adopt laws that are not compatible with the Armenian type. Thinking that arbitrary or inappropriate compliance with these or some other requirements will be a task,.