blog




  • Essay / Death Penalty: How the End Justifies the Mean

    The Bill of Rights, particularly the Eight Amendments, prohibits cruel, degrading, inhumane, and unusual punishments. If there is a punishment more cruel than death, let us know. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay There is no doubt that killing another person is the most heinous crime one can commit. However, it should have been clear by now that capital punishment is not the solution to our worsening, indeed desperate, crime situation. Furthermore, killing criminals has never been proven to actually deter crime. However, as our country grows older and wiser, the evidence clearly indicates that the death penalty is never a good solution. after committing a heinous crime under due process, he will be executed. In the long history of the Philippines, the death penalty was known and accepted, but it is currently suspended since 2006 when then President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo signed Republic Act No. 9346, also known under the name of the law prohibiting the imposition of capital punishment. of the death penalty in the country, as RA No. 7659 did not prove to be a deterrent against crime and those who opposed the said act believed that it was an inhumane, ambiguous, illegal, costly and ineffective against illegal drugs and heinous crimes. . But some of his supporters consider this act humane, the most appropriate punishment and an effective deterrent against crime, because it deters "criminals" from committing serious crimes and they have to think about it several times before doing so. TO DO. For them too, without the death penalty, some criminals would continue to commit crimes, but they do not know how serious the circumstances are and how it actually affects the victims and their families. Electrocution is a modern method of execution. Other methods of punishing a person who commits a crime include strangulation, death by fire, lethal injection, stoning to death, poison, hanging, beheading and firing squad, which Dr. Jose Rizal experimented on December 30, 1896 during the Spanish Civil War. Colonization in the Philippines. Given the “imperfections” of the criminal justice system, the prospect of executing innocent people remains. The death penalty thus makes judicial errors irreversible; it requires a huge legal process because it involves life. “In September 2015, Pope Francis urged the United States to abolish the death penalty during a speech to Congress. Similar to a previous pope, Pope Francis advocated abolition because all life is sacred, each human person is endowed with inalienable dignity and society can only benefit from the rehabilitation of recognized crimes (“Discourse of the Holy Father "). Although the Roman Catholic Church now opposes capital punishment, its strong stance in favor of abolition is quite decentralized. » “The idea that the death penalty will rid the country of drugs is simply false. Resumption of executions will not rid the Philippines of drug problems or deter crime. This is an inhumane and ineffective punishment that is never the solution. The Philippines' attempts to reintroduce it are clearly illegal. This will only give the country notoriety as one of the few countries to revive its horrific use, said Champa Patel, Amnesty International's director for Southeast Asia and the Pacific. Many people are sent to prison and it is.