John Searle and Alan Turing have contrasting views on the debate over artificial intelligence (AI) and consciousness. Alan Turing is best known for developing the Turing Test, which is used to see if a machine can fool someone into thinking they are a person. John Searle refutes this argument by proposing the idea of ​​the Chinese room, proving that machines are incapable of truly understanding information. Both Searle and Turing are at the cinema watching Ex Machina debate the status of Ava, artificial intelligence and consciousness. Each of their points of view differs, even if they discuss them intelligently. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay A general theme throughout the film is that of the Turing test and whether or not Ava can pass it. So, Alan Turing begins by analyzing whether or not Ava would pass the Turing test. Turing specifically wants to know if Ava can do the things that people can do. At first, Ava wouldn't be able to get through. During the first session, Ava is asked her opinion and she says she doesn't know. Once again, in the second session, she draws something and is unable to say what it is. Immediately, this would show that she is just a machine. Searle would say that this can go with the Chinese room; a machine is capable of processing information but it is incapable of understanding. But throughout the film, she acquires opinions as well as other qualities that might indicate that she would be able to pass a real Turing test. For example, in the fifth session, she worries about whether or not Nathan will fire her. She doesn't understand why she needs to be tested to see if she's conscious when no human needs to be tested. By the end of the film, she seemed to display true artificial intelligence. She listened as Caleb explained how he was going to help her escape. She actually understood what he was saying and she used his plan to get out of it. She applied her knowledge and understanding to respond physically. Turing would agree that Ava is a machine with artificial intelligence. Additionally, she shows that she is also conscious. When Caleb approaches her, she almost seems to sense his presence. She demonstrates intuition when she expresses during the second session that Nathan is not Caleb's friend. She even says during the fourth session that she feels sad. She can tell Nathan is lying. She couldn't know that if she wasn't aware or perceptive in some way. According to Turing, he would say that it is capable of passing the Turing test. Searle would not be willing to agree with Turing, at least entirely, because he thinks Ava would never be able to understand. If she were placed in the Chinese room, she would react like everyone else and simply follow the movements of a machine. Just like Google Translate, it doesn't actually understand the translation process, but just spits out words. More to the point, Searle would be inclined to admit that she doesn't understand, especially when she's drawing a picture. She could draw the Swiss Alps, but she wouldn't actually understand what they were, unless of course she was programmed before she knew. Once again, she doesn't necessarily understand. The Turing test is not enough for Ava to prove that she is thinking; it just proves that she can simulate thoughts. This would prove Searle's point about intelligence..