The question of ethical behavior is an age-old conundrum. The main problem with ethics is that it is extremely difficult to measure. A person's moral fabric is based largely on their particular personality traits, as well as their psychological state and environmental influences. Many believe that ethics are linked to a person's conscience and that good morals are often facilitated by a strong religious background. Additionally, a person's moral development may be related to their economic situation and cultural differences. It is interesting to note that although it is difficult to examine the status of his moral code; everyone seems to have their own range of ethics. Although it is an ambiguous subject, rife with speculation and ambivalence, it is an attractive subject of study. A curious facet of the ethical dilemma is that it transcends various areas of interest. The question of ethics is closely studied by philosophers and psychologists, but this theme is frequently introduced in other programs. Accounting, for example, has its own set of ethical mandates. Additionally, almost every profession is covered by a generally accepted code of ethics: doctors, lawyers, entrepreneurs, and the list goes on! In fact, almost every day an individual is faced with a moral decision. Currently, one of the major ethical debates in the United States concerns the decision to adopt or abolish the death penalty. This debate is remarkable because it affects several different segments of society. Capital punishment can be beneficial to our community because the practice of capital punishment, both appropriate and effective, can produce beneficial results. Consider the amount of government money that is pumped into the justice system; as well as the poignant... middle of paper ... athetic indifference, is it ethical for them to be granted life? Another, perhaps disparate, element of the moral dilemma of capital punishment arises from a more economic perspective. Consider all the government money that goes into the criminal system: is it “fair” that tax dollars are being spent to keep these people alive?! The vast majority of murderers have lost their position in society and are now supported indefinitely until they die. These people receive three meals a day, exercise, spend time watching television, and even enjoy community privileges. Many of these revolting degenerates lead a more carefree and structured life in the clink than some poor citizens. However, the deceased victim, an often overlooked component of this intriguing debate, should be presented as an essential part of ethical review..