College football is one of the most popular and followed sports in the United States. College football has grown to such prominence that it brings substantial revenue to the team's college or university, as well as reputation and credibility. However, due to the high revenue that college football brings to universities, there are instances where inappropriate fouls take place that are overlooked by university authorities. In such cases, as well as other instances where misconduct is apparent within college athletic teams or staff, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) was founded so that in cases of ethical violations and Inappropriate practices that take place in collegiate athletics, the correct set of sanctions are awarded in order to promote an ethical environment where the rights of student-athletes are protected and where excellence and fair play are expected (Ferrell, Fraedrich & Ferrell , 2014, p. 444). This article will seek to explain how the NCAA encourages college football programs to develop a culture of ethics and compliance, while analyzing criticism that the NCAA is based more on compliance than ethical values, as well as the question how student-athletes, coaches, and university administrators can demonstrate a proactive response to ethics and compliance. Say no to plagiarism. Get a Custom Essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essay The NCAA was an organization founded in 1906 with the original goal of protecting student-athletes from endangerment and violence. exploitation. It was with time and the growth of collegiate sports themselves that the NCAA also grew and its goals, as well as its rules and policies, expanded. Appendix Table 1 provides a list of principles of conduct expected of student-athletes and staff involved in collegiate sports, and it is clear from this table that the NCAA has no tolerance for unethical events at within collegiate sports. In order to promote an ethical environment within collegiate sports, the NCAA not only establishes rules and policies relating to collegiate teams, but it also actively enforces them in cases of violations by the NCAA, where university authorities are in ultimately held responsible for their lack of respect. action and control over the football department within their university. The role of the NCAA is essential in creating an ethical environment within collegiate sports. However, even though the NCAA carefully enforces its rules and policies and does not discriminate when it comes to imposing sanctions, it is nevertheless criticized by some for not being harsh enough and by others for being too severe. The criticism leveled at the NCAA is valid as there have been instances where NCAA investigators have conducted their investigations inappropriately, as well as the unquestionable increase in unethical behavior within college football. For example, one of the criticisms leveled at the NCAA concerns one of its former investigators, Ameen Najjar, who was reprimanded and fired from the NCAA for attempting to obtain and present improperly collected evidence to the court and false. Although the NCAA quickly fired Najjar, the affair nonetheless damaged the organization's credibility and reputation. Additionally, as mentioned above, there have been increasing reports of ethical misconduct activities within college football, such as match-fixing where the sportis managed fraudulently in order to gain higher funds from a booster, who is a wealthy fan of the team who is willing to do so. making payments to see what he wants in a game. Critics therefore have support in their arguments when they complain about the lack of severity of the sanctions imposed by the NCAA. Because of the damage Najjar has done to the NCAA's reputation, as well as the increase in inappropriate behavior at sports games, it is all the more significant that the NCAA carefully and actively imposes its rules and sanctions on colleges and universities that require it, without making the student-athlete team uncomfortable. It cannot be argued that the fact that the NCAA is based more on compliance than ethical values ​​is a valid criticism, because the reason the NCAA even has a compliance package is due to its emphasis on values ethical. The NCAA, an organization originally founded to incorporate ethical values ​​into collegiate sports, regardless of the criticism it receives, continues to actively ensure, to the best of its ability, that it imposes the appropriate regulations for the situations required. Here are two examples of where the NCAA has imposed sanctions appropriately, and they also show the investigative process the NCAA prefers to follow when making decisions, to ensure fairness is executed. In 2011, accusations were made within the Penn State football team that a former assistant coach named Jerry Sandusky had "sexually assaulted at least eight young boys over the course of many years." The school showed a lack of action and helped explain why Sandusky escaped his crime for so long. An initial report was first published in 1998 alleging possible misconduct between the former assistant coach and an underage boy, and was dismissed due to lack of evidence. However, in 2001, when a graduate assistant allegedly witnessed Sandusky sexually assaulting another young boy and reported it to head coach Joe Paterno, the school made the huge mistake of not taking the matter further. report and investigation, when Paterno informed and denounced Sandusky. It was eventually discovered that Penn State authorities and officials, as well as head coach, Joe Paterno, were primarily responsible for the events within their football team, which cost Penn State $60 million. fine, a four-year post-season ban prohibiting eligibility for any post-game through 2016, and a four-year reduction in scholarships amounting to ten scholarships per year for the football program” (Ferrell, Fraedrich & Ferrell, 2014, p. 450). After these sanctions were imposed by the NCAA, the football team's ability to win games and practice effectively was damaged and they were unable to compete with other teams, which proves to how severe the sanctions imposed by the NCAA can be. The most significant corrective action taken against Penn State was having them sign the Athletic Integrity Agreement, an agreement specifically formulated for Penn State officials and staff. Penn State's signing of the Athletic Integrity Agreement allowed the NCAA to require the college to take certain corrective actions, such as "adding a compliance officer for the athletics department, creating a compliance board and comprehensive speaking program, adding accountability and certifications for that accountability, implementing an external compliance review/certification process, drafting a compliance code of conduct athletics, conduct of training and education, and appointment of an instructor.