The consequences of the process of national reorganization in Argentina Genocide is the massacre of a specific group of people for an ideological reason or ethnic. The genocide in Argentina was political and ideological. Argentina underwent a process of reorganization aimed at eliminating communist ideas and promoting Western and Christian ideals. The Argentine government fell into a military dictatorship that committed horrific violence against the civilian population. Due to harsh policies, cities have built concentration camps or clandestine centers in an attempt to silence political activists. This article will analyze how the United States influenced Operation Condor in an effort to create social change in Argentina. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayOperation Condor began after the Cuban Revolution out of fear that Latin American countries would become communist or socialist. Operation Condor targeted ideological enemies who challenged traditional Western ideals. Their views on enemies ranged from peaceful social activists to armed revolutionaries. “The Condor apparatus was a covert component of a broader U.S.-led counterinsurgency strategy aimed at preempting or reversing social movements demanding political and socioeconomic change” (McSherry, p.1). The United States participated in the creation of Operation Condor under the leadership of Henry Kissinger. He was aware of the human rights violations occurring in Argentina. Despite the change of power in Argentina, Kissinger ensured that the military personnel of Operation Condor would receive sufficient funding. Indirectly, this created a military dictatorship, which committed atrocities and restricted any documentation showing the plans of military juntas. However, Argentines wanted change and intellectuals believed their economy could benefit from the West. “Prominent Latin American leaders and intellectuals linked Third World underdevelopment to the neocolonial practices of major Western states and demanded self-determination and control of national resources” (McSherry, p. 2). The Argentine people wanted autonomy for their nation and did not want their government to act in the best interests of the West. When Argentina's military dictatorship began following the U.S. agenda, people began disappearing due to their affiliations with political parties and activist movements. “A key goal of these states was to depoliticize and demobilize politically active groups and movements of workers, students, peasants, and intellectuals identified as 'internal enemies'” (McSherry, p. 4) . This was a political genocide because many civilians did not know they were at war against their own government, which created powerlessness. Progressive leaders were the main targets and the first to disappear due to their influence in creating a revolution. “Under Operation Condor, military and paramilitary commandos “disappeared” refugees and exiles – including democratic leaders – who had fled coups and repression in their own countries” (McSherry , p.4). The kidnappings of leaders and activists have affected daily life and created social unrest in Argentine society due to fears that they will be the next to disappear. “The victims were kidnapped as they were going downbuses, while walking home from school or work, or during nighttime raids on private residences and shelters where guerrilla groups or banned business and student organizations lived in hiding” (Goldman, p.1). The military regime targeted the general population in political genocide because it believed anyone could be anti-Western and wanted socialist practices that would benefit everyone. During this political genocide, the military kidnapped pregnant mothers who were then killed, leading military families to raise their children with the "right ideals." The process of national reorganization brainwashed an entire generation that was raised in military families. “The process of national reorganization wanted to define and create “authentic Argentines” (Goldman, p.1). These children constituted a clean slate in the reconstruction of society as the military dictatorship wanted to create it. In the New Yorker, Clara Anahi was a baby when she was kidnapped from her home. Both parents were murdered due to their political involvement in Monteros and the direction of an underground newspaper called Evita. For example, Jorgelina Molina Planas grew up under the name Carolina Maria Sala. His father was involved in the People's Revolutionary Army. Due to her political activism, Jorgelina lost both of her biological parents and never knew of their contributions. The military family degraded the memory of their biological parents, calling them terrorists. “But when she finally found the courage to reclaim her identity after her adoptive mother died in 2009, he disowned her. “He wouldn’t accept that I was Jorgelina,” she said” (Sutterud, p.1). This is proof that Jorgelina knew she was not part of this family and never felt like she was truly part of it. This genocide not only created violence against people who questioned Western Christian values, but it also brought violence into their homes and stole a generation of youth. Jorgelina and Clara's personal stories only scratch the surface of the insidious purpose of the dirty wars. Clara and Jorgelina had parents who belonged to “terrorist groups” like the People’s Revolutionary Army and Monetras. Both of these groups were guerrilla groups who fought for one cause: to ensure that their voices were heard despite the disappearances. The Catholic Church supported the actions of the military regime. Fernstein uses the example of Archbishop Jorge Mayer when he states: "The subversive guerrillas want to steal the cross, the symbol of all Christians, to crush and divide the entire Argentine people with the hammer and sickle" (Fernstein, p.152). The symbolism is very apparent in this statement in which the cross represents good, the hammer and sickle evil. General Jorge Rafael Videla defined terrorism in a very pervasive way and socially constructed an image of the terrorist. Videla describes “a terrorist is not just someone who possesses a weapon or a bomb, but anyone who propagates acts contrary to our Western and Christian civilization” (Fernstein, p. 153). Videla's statement puts into perspective the type of hostility of the Argentine military regime towards political organizations such as the Popular Revolutionary. Before carrying out disappearances, it was necessary to create a social construction to justify their actions. Fernstein states: “Even though there were many differences between these two constructs – ‘race’ and ‘subversive criminal’ – the image of the latter figure also showed a radical and unassimilable otherness.”(Fernstein, p. 159). This political genocide not only destroyed the lives of those affected as a whole, but it also harmed the social community. Because the identities of the missing have been reduced to a basic level in which they cannot be named or traced, so there is no form of closure. Due to the lack of closure, organizations have been created in order to investigate and locate missing children as well as find out what happened to their loved ones. Obtaining the legitimate identities of many of these abducted children has proven extremely difficult, even with the work of the Grandmothers of the Plaza de Mayo. One of these organizations was the Abuelas of the Plaza de Mayo and the Mothers of the Plaza de Mayo and they had only recovered a fraction of what the Military Juntas had taken from them. These human rights organizations have even created a blood bank and an atmosphere of anonymity for people who believe they are given an artificial identity. Even the nature of these forced separations was violent, as pregnant women gave birth in horrible conditions and the baby was then ripped from the mother's arms. After the birth, the mother was transferred to another clandestine center or put on a death flight, in which the body was thrown into the Atlantic Ocean. The Abuelas of Plaza de Mayo have done considerable work to find the real identity of their child. grandchildren and bring their captors to justice. Despite the honorable intentions of these organizations, there was resistance from children kidnapped and raised in families who valued the ideals of the military dictatorship. The role of the Abuelas of the Plaza de Mayo is extremely important because they are aware of the events that occurred during the dirty wars. However, in some cases, the grandchildren of the disappeared do not cooperate with the justice system. For example, Al Jazzera's news documentary Lost and Found discusses the difficult process these kidnapped children went through to discover that their identity was a lie and the shame they felt upon discovering the identify. It is true that their biological parents were left-wing guerrillas. One of these cases talks about Maris Sol Tetzlaff, but her real identity is Victoria Montenegro whose parents were part of a guerrilla group. Victoria said her house was raided and military forces killed her parents. After the raid, Commander Tetzlaff found Victoria hiding under the kitchen table and was later adopted by the man who killed her parents. However, his true identity and family ties would not have been found without Abuelas de Plaza de Mayo and without the help of a law passed by the Kirscher administration. This law had supported the state's right to acquire the DNA of suspected young adults who were children of missing persons. However, the problem is that these same children do not want to be found and refuse to find their true identity. There is another case where children refused to know their identity and wanted to remain in the dark because they believed their adoptive parents were biological. and loved them for their artificial identity. The Noble siblings were adopted by a powerful and influential woman in the media, who has been a vocal critic of the democratic government currently in place in Argentina. Argentinian authorities had forcibly obtained the siblings' DNA sample. Due to the new law requiring DNA samples to be taken for trials intended to punish families who have raised questions, however, it is questionable whether the government is seeking justice or revenge for the children of the missing. THE.