Currently, there are several definitions of asymmetric threats listed on the Internet as well as in other publications. In my opinion, the definition that best sums up the meaning is that of employing unconventional tactics against a superior adversary with the aim of disrupting the drive to achieve operational objectives. The most common and current example would be the insurgent tactics used in Iraq and Afghanistan. The United States should not assume that these tactics and strategies will be used only abroad. The same asymmetric threats facing our nation's security initiative are the same challenges facing seaports. Some examples of the potential asymmetric threats facing the United States seaport are nuclear weapons, chemical weapons, biological weapons, and terrorism. Nuclear weapons are one of the key elements for countries/states to be considered a global superpower. The mere possession of a nuclear weapon guarantees a country a position of negation towards other world powers. Countries like the United States and the United Kingdom have a vested interest in knowing who has the capabilities to avoid such negotiations. The ongoing crisis with North Korea is a perfect example of the United States' diligence in avoiding failure to account for the potential threat of nuclear weapons. The employment of nuclear weapons in a seaport would significantly slow or deter the process of deployment for operational military functions. Injury, casualties, and damage to infrastructure would be significant, and any successful attempt would cripple any military or commercial cargo transport operation. Compared to nuclear weapons, chemical weapons are less damaging, but are easier to acquire. Both threats could be delivered in a container...... middle of paper ......ked, the port customs team will be required to inspect the shortfall. An automated system would track the status (checked/unchecked) from start to finish. At the port of shipment, a U.S. Customs team will work in conjunction with local customs authorities to ensure program accuracy. The current technology used to monitor and examine container contents is excellent. Non-intrusive physical inspections (X-ray machines) and container tracking are all excellent tools and all counties should continue to use these resources. The biggest obstacle to my proposed plan would be funding. The United States should stand firm against countries that export goods to the United States. Customs programs should be federally funded; therefore, the government of the exporting country should take a decision on the economic future of its country.