blog




  • Essay / Analysis of same-sex marriage from a social science perspective

    Same-sex marriage, even though it was legalized on June 26, 2015, remains a controversial topic that has been frequently challenged in recent years. In this debate, there are two camps: those who oppose same-sex marriage and those who support it. Those who support same-sex marriage cite themes of discrimination, persecution and freedom of speech. Illegalizing same-sex marriage, as they claim, would be an act of discrimination against the gay community, preventing the expression of love through marriage. This seems no better than the persecution that gay men and women faced in the early years of society. Those who oppose same-sex marriage typically invoke the concept of religion, protesting that the legalization of same-sex marriage goes against religiously based moral values, is ungodly, and that homosexuality itself does not respect not the laws of nature. However, another common concept of evidence is that of social science and how same-sex marriage will affect the mass and future generations. This topic is quite diverse and extends to different situations, so before delving into this notion, the only thing that needs to be understood is sexual orientation. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”?Get an original essayThe definition of sexual orientation refers to sexual, emotional, and/or romantic attraction to one's gender(s). ), as well as the behavior and attractions that follow. This conveys the idea that environmental factors can affect and even determine a person's sexual orientation, as well as the idea that sexual orientation and homosexuality can also be determined genetically. After years of study, it has been confirmed that there is a "gay gene." The genes are found on chromosomes 13 and 14, affecting the hypothalamus and thyroid. The thyroid gene, TSHR, affects the control of thyroid function, causing excessive functioning, while the gene affecting the hypothalamus, SLTRK6, determines the interconnection between the neuroanatomical molecule and sexual orientation. It has not yet been proven that environmental factors, besides the likely influence of upbringing, affect the sexual orientation of children, but this is assumed and is still under study. The main reason why same-sex marriage is so problematic is the difference in religious beliefs. Homosexuality is something that has been looked down upon for decades, even centuries. Over time, homosexuality began to be increasingly accepted and recognized in the public eye. They began to fight for equal rights, and with that came the right to marry someone of the same sex. Christians and Catholics, as well as many other faiths, believe in marriage between a man and a woman. It is believed that God put men and women on Earth to be one, as shown in the famous biblical story of Adam and Eve. The actively religious population strongly holds these views, which is entirely legal under the First Amendment. This is where the approval of same-sex marriage became problematic; the public was divided into two morally different camps and neither would be satisfied if the decision did not constitute their original verdict. Morality seemed to be the basis for each side, with each side having a different understanding of right and wrong on this topic. Social science was then presented as evidence for both sides, each creatinga stronger foundation for their views, addressing topics such as infidelity, gender roles and the effects on children and future generations. There are many ideas in social science that those who oppose same-sex marriage exploit to their advantage. Among these statements, many of them concern the future generation and the upbringing of children, the most important being the need of mothers and fathers in same-sex relationships. Mothers provide emotional stability, as well as physical understanding and familiarity towards daughters, which will be lacking in a relationship between two men. Fathers reduce hypersexual activity in girls and antisocial behavior in boys, while setting an example of how men should act and treat women. Without these influences, it is said that girls will participate in sexual acts at younger ages, including teenage pregnancies, and boys will become unruly and antisocial. This brings us to the topic of gender roles and the inadequacy of same-sex parenting. It is claimed that the "small difference" between children raised by heterosexual and same-sex couples is preliminary due to the assumption that most studies are done by proponents of same-sex marriage. The evidence from these studies may have been downplayed and therefore biased to reflect the primary judgment. Regarding gender roles, marriage is believed to thrive on the basis of respect for the gender roles of men and women, demonstrating the separation of responsibilities in marriage. Men, as has been the case for centuries, are expected to be the workers in the family. They are expected to generate income for the household and become the backbone of the family. Women are expected to play the role of mothers as mothers, taking care of household chores and maintenance. When these “requirements” are met, married men are shown to be less likely to be sexually unfaithful and domesticated as their testosterone levels drop. Not only that, but heterosexual married men are also shown to work harder and earn more financially. Same-sex couples, especially between men, are unnatural and therefore do not domesticate men, making them less committed and more prone to infidelity. Social science can also be an advantage for supporters of same-sex marriage. It has been held by district courts that it is stability between both parents, rather than sex or gender, that ensures the well-being of the child. A child's well-being is affected more by situations and emotions than by the gender and sexual orientation of caregivers, provided that the family is economically and socially healthy and the child feels a sense of security and adequacy. Sexual orientation and choice of partner, however, can result in a lack of opportunities for the same-sex couple, which can cause stress and tension within the household, affecting the well-being not only of the couple, but also of the couple. 'child. When opting for adoption, foster care, or reproductive assistance, couples cannot be turned away based on their gender or sexual orientation, but rather are judged on their economic and social competence, as well as on their ability to care for the child thoroughly. Marriage is used as a mechanism to strengthen relationships and families, which is no different for same-sex couples, and the deprivation of marriage is what can actually harm a child's well-being. To return to gender and.