If Nixon and his aides had succeeded in their efforts, Nixon would probably have been re-elected president. If he were president in a scrupulous manner, it would be a violation of the democratic rights of citizens. As a result, there would have been a high probability of protests and probably the start of a coup d'état which could have resulted in loss of life. Likewise, this would mean that as a corrupt leader, he would not fight corruption in his country but would instead strive to keep his actions secret to avoid arrest. Nixon would also continue to engage in other illegal acts, which would lead to the collapse of the state's economy. If Woodward and Bernstein had identified Mr. Felt as their source, the chances of Nixon being indicted would likely have diminished. The reason would be that Mr. Felt only disclosed false information because Nixon had not appointed him president of the FBI. Otherwise, Mr. Felt would have lost his job or even been imprisoned for knowing everything that was happening and doing nothing. Journalists also reportedly saw their careers interrupted, probably because their reporting was no longer viable. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Nixon's actions in the Watergate scandal and Clinton's actions in the Monica Lewinsky scandal have many differences, just as they have similarities. In both cases, both presidents feared losing their chances of being re-elected if they gave in to their mistakes. In both situations, the presidents also lied to the FBI for their own benefit. However, during the Watergate action, Nixon decided to resign after realizing he would be charged guilty, unlike Clinton, who was impeached and did not admit to the allegations. Furthermore, Nixon worked to protect himself by giving jobs to people who were loyal to him, meaning they would never testify against him, while Clinton simply defended himself by not admitting any wrongdoing. In my opinion, Mr. Felt is a hero; just because he may have a soft spot for Nixon doesn't mean that whatever he did was wrong. He gave information that helped protect the democratic rights of citizens by removing Nixon from the presidency. I would also consider him a hero for defending the FBI he worked for for a very long time. He gives the state a greater advantage by telling the truth about the Watergate scandal. He also proves his loyalty to his country by revealing the crimes that were taking place. I think the Nixon and Trump presidencies are quite similar. First, Trump does not trust the FBI to conduct crucial domestic investigations. Likewise, Nixon could not trust the FBI because he knew it was connected to the crimes. Both presidents are said to be equally resentful and insecure, with Nixon ranting to the press and Trump tweeting angrily about the news being spread about him. Finally, Nixon was charged with obstruction of justice, as was Trump, who is under investigation for the same reason. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay In conclusion, I would rate the film deserves five stars for being so straightforward about the occurrence of all the events. This clearly shows us how the two journalists conducted their research and how corrupt Nixon was without the citizens knowing. The film is factual since it contains clear evidence of all things.