Adlai E. Stevenson's Rejection of the Silly Notion of Senate Bill 93, the "Cat Bill," is stated through deliberate literary facets, intended to belittle and warn the senators to pay more attention to their actions and literary allusions to .Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Stevenson cleverly mocks the insanity of "Cat Bill" with key words that deliberately manipulate the reader's point of view. The double meaning of the word “nature” leads the reader to consider the archetype of the cat. The nature of an animal is something fixed and cannot be changed. The nature of cats is compared to that of humans in terms of unaccompanied roaming and reluctance to be leashed. Animals are not domesticated by the law of nature and if “we try to solve this problem through legislation, who knows, but we might be called upon to take sides.” His statement, respectful and sarcastic, guides the reader with legal precedent. It would be irrational to solve nature's problems with human laws. Stevenson's purpose in using the word "nature" highlights the folly of punishing an animal for its intrinsic characterization and also the folly of allowing a creature to pursue human morality. Stevenson uses his diction to also downplay the bill and ensure his senators never waste his time again. The literary allusions develop Adlai's intelligence in his satire. He refers to struggles “as old as time” such as the war between “cats and dogs”. This childish argument gives a negative connotation to the “Cat Bill”. Stevenson continues to play with language, concluding that it is “not because I love birds less or cats more.” This Shakespearean allusion to the famous play “Julius Caesar” serves as a humorous note in terms of context and meaning. This follows the first allusion where Stevenson addresses his Senate, "To the honorable..." just as Brutus did. Stevenson, like Antony, uses satire to discredit his opponent's point of view. Antony repeats that Brutus is an honorable man in order to sow doubt in the minds of the citizens. As Stevenson continues, he discredits his Senate and reveals how stupid it is to think it was all-powerful when a bill such as Senate Bill 39 went as far as he did it. The goal is for his Senate to recognize the absurdities with which he agreed. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article now from our expert writers. Get a Custom Essay Stevenson's intelligence and command of language allow him to disapprove Senate Bill 39 should be taken with respect. His satire and literary knowledge effectively explain the ridiculous absurdities of the proposition..