Recently, doping in sport has become a huge problem. Doping is used in sport in order to cheat the system and gain an unfair advantage over other competitors. Various careers have been ruined across multiple sports and trophies as important as Olympic medals have been confiscated. Even if various precautions have been attempted, doping control remains limited due to new substances which are constantly being improved and controls are increasingly unsuccessful. Additionally, many companies and promotions have lost money due to drug test failures. However, it's not just private business owners and developers who are angry about this topic; the public is also disappointed. “Eighty-eight adults in the United States today agree that more should be done to prevent the use of PEDs in the Olympics and professional sports (89%). » Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay There are many debates over whether doping should be banned completely or limited to a controlled extent. Although it seems obvious, we should deeply question whether banning doping completely is the right thing to do. For example, if it is considered wrong to improve performance through doping, then why is it not also wrong to take certain dietary supplements, consume carbohydrates, or train at altitude? Yet there are some logical reasons why doping is cracked down with such harsh intent. The main reason is obviously the fact that it gives an unfair advantage over other competitors. For example, imagine if one car's fuel capacity was only half full and another car was full of fuel, so it was a question of which car would last the longest on the road while maintaining the same speed, the car with more fuel would do so. undoubtedly win. This is the kind of benefit that doping can bring to athletes. However, if there are different ways to gain benefits, such as implementing different diet techniques and training methods, why aren't these methods also considered cheating? Based on general public opinion, it seems that the ideology behind banning doping is simply because it goes against the rules and is therefore considered cheating. Yet few people wonder what would happen if the rules were slightly bent. Julian Savulescu, a sports ethicist, makes a point of allowing doping in this article by Scott Douglass: “For starters,” says Savulescu, “the current system of control has largely failed to deter or catch cheaters. ; he cites an estimate that the probability of detecting doping is 2.9%. This fact, combined with the fact that athletes come up against the limits of human performance (in his view), makes the use of performance-enhancing drugs inevitable. Savulescu's argument is not just about what might seem like giving up the fight. According to him, the legalization of doping products would make it possible to regulate them. This, in turn, would increase safety and reduce risks for athletes using them. Savulescu also points out that opposing doping because it gives athletes an unfair advantage ignores the realities of modern sport. Numerous legal practices and devices, from sleeping in an altitude chamber to consuming.