-
Essay / Modernism is not practical for public housing
One of the main concepts repeated throughout the modernist movement is Louis Sullivan's “form follows function”. This goes hand in hand with a concept from Le Corbusier: “a house is a machine for living in”. Modernism gained popularity after World War II, but this movement did not last because it "could not understand and respond adequately to the social dynamics of family and community and, therefore, many Modernist buildings were demolished in the seventies. . Although this movement has not stood the test of time, the innovation and inspiration of future movements makes modernism very important. “Removing comfort from the interior of the house may purify the design, but it does little to encourage the creation of a ‘home’ rather than a house,” as we see in social and public housing. The concept of public housing originated in 1937, when "the federal government formally became involved in public housing under the American Housing Act." Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Modernist ideals were first applied in this housing system in the same year by Maxwell Fry at Kendal House. The design became entirely focused on the building, as the focus was no longer on the occupants, but more on the structural aesthetic of the building and how their exposure would create an impact. Designs such as the skyscraper were made possible by the introduction of new materials: glass, concrete and steel. It was these materials that inspired the removal/limitation of ornamentation, as they brought a new aesthetic of their own. The expression “form follows function” could not find a better expression than social housing, because the form of buildings is entirely based on their function, or at least that is what was believed at the time . This form of housing requires that the building be easily reproducible and provide a neutral space where it can be personalized to the taste of the users. Although modernism allows it, occupants may not have the ability to personalize their home due to socio-economic factors: social housing, like social housing, is budget-based and aimed at people who cannot afford it. not be financially stable. This MUST be taken into consideration when designing social/public houses. Should WELL standards be applied to social housing? To fully grasp the idea of making WELL standards a priority in social housing, we must first develop a better understanding of the occupants. “The new housing was primarily developed for World War II veterans and did not provide much help to those who were not.” The Second Housing Act of 1954 "focused on the conservation and rehabilitation of slums". Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a Custom Essay Social houses of the modernist movement, initially intended for veterans and people living in poverty, did not offer the comforting, "homey" feeling of leaving home, just a house. While some may view this as an affective design, others may disagree due to the fact that these occupants may have mental health issues that could be aggravated by a cold, institutional atmosphere in the design of their House. WELL standards..