The state of Texas has passed some of the strictest laws in the country restricting a woman's right to have an abortion. Despite the landmark ruling by the Supreme Court in Roe. After Wade in 1973, which legalized abortion nationwide, Texas legislature continues to create laws to regulate women's reproductive rights. The decision to abort must be made by the woman, she must have the right to privacy in this matter and her rights to terminate the pregnancy must not be limited. Therefore, we must vote against Texas lawmakers who are deliberately trying to impose their moral objections to women's human rights. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essayThe political culture in Texas was once conservative Democrat or even moderate Democrat. Over time we have had a large influx of new residents with conservative views, we have seen the conversion of conservative Democrats to the Republican Party. These are some of the reasons for the realignment. Today, the Texas legislature is made up primarily of the Republican Party. The overwhelming majority of members are conservative, Anglo-Christian, right-wing men. Conservative Republicans tend to believe that the best role of government in economic affairs is a limited role and that traditional (and often religious) views of social issues and moral decisions are best. They oppose major social programs that expand the role of government, as well as taxes on individuals and businesses. Finally, they oppose major social programs that expand the role of government. Since Republicans now control the legislature and make up the majority of voters who vote for what they believe, we continue to see conservative abortion laws being passed. . In 2003, Texas passed the Women's Right to Know Act, which requires women who want an abortion after 16 weeks of pregnancy to go to a hospital or outpatient surgical center. The women also had to complete two separate medical visits. During the first visit, doctors were required to “inform the woman that certain types of medical assistance benefits may be available to her; ; the father is liable for child support; public and private agencies provide pregnancy prevention counseling and referrals for contraception, including emergency contraceptives for victims of rape and incest; and she has the right to view state printed materials, also available on the Internet, describing the fetus and listing agencies that provide alternatives to abortion,” and explain in detail what the abortion procedure entailed. When this law was put in place, none of the facilities met the requirement to be an outpatient surgical center, limiting facility options for women. The 24-hour delay was required between visits and was a way for conservatives to try to impose their moral values ​​on the rights of others. Essentially, they gave women a 24-hour cooling-off period to make them feel guilty about having an abortion. The second visit would include the actual abortion procedure. In 2012, the Texas ultrasound law went into effect requiring a woman to have an ultrasound 24 hours before the procedure. It required the doctor to dictate what he saw and listen to the heartbeat of the fetus. In 2013, theHouse Bill 2 was signed by Rick Perry and put into effect. This bill lists some of the most drastic attempts to restrict abortion, which ordered doctors "to have admitting privileges at a hospital within 30 miles of the abortion center" and banned "the abortion after 20 weeks after fertilization, unless the woman has a life-threatening medical examination.” state of health or the fetus presents a serious abnormality; Doctors who administer medical abortion must follow a state-mandated protocol; All abortion facilities must meet standards for ambulatory surgery centers, including facilities that provide only medical abortion services. If not used, HB2 could have caused the majority of abortion clinics to close because doctors did not meet requirements. Essentially, it would also have left the remaining abortion clinics unable to provide services to hundreds of women because they would not have been able to keep up with demand. It would also affect women who were close to the 20-week gestation period and risk their availability to have an abortion. HB2 would also have made it more difficult for women considered low-income, since they would not only have to pay for abortion services, but also pay to travel to the abortion center closest to them. Finally, in 2014, Whole Woman's Health took John Hellerstedt, the Texas Department of State's health services commissioner, to the Supreme Court and overturned HB2. The Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional and said it placed an undue burden on low-income women. In 2005, the Texas legislature passed a law that required parental consent for minors under the age of 18. Back then there were options for emancipated teenagers, they had to go for them. in court and obtain approval and signature from a judge. However, in 2015, these laws were made stricter by only allowing them to obtain approval from a judge in their home county. As a teenage mother myself, I do not believe that parental consent should be required for abortion. From an outside perspective, it seems logical for a child to talk to their parents about an important decision they are about to make. The parent could perhaps help the young mother not to abort, but I still believe that it is up to the mother, regardless of her age, to decide if she wants to continue with the pregnancy and not be forced by her parents to undergo pregnancy if she does not obtain consent. Conservatives also opposed abortion, arguing that they did not want their tax dollars to help pay for more abortions. Texas House Bill 214 was signed by Greg Abbott on August 15, 2018, limiting insurance coverage for abortions and stating: "This bill prohibits insurers from forcing Texas policyholders to subsidize elective abortions" . This bill leaves women with fewer alternatives as they are forced to pay out of pocket, or possibly obtain financial assistance from abortion centers that receive subsidies. For women who want to “plan ahead,” they can purchase a supplemental plan with health insurance that will cover abortion costs in cases of rape, incest, and abortion by personal decision. Ultimately, this restricts women's rights by placing a burden on low-income women who cannot afford to pay out of pocket or who cannot afford alternative health insurance. This also limits the possibility of help that a center.