Since the early days of government benefits, when welfare recipients' homes were inspected by social workers for cleanliness , the poor were asked to prove their worth in order to receive state aid. Have you ever stopped and thought about how much the rich get from government and all the benefits they receive? However, they have never been tested for doping. Those with more than $100 million in assets received more government transfers in 2014 than the average household in the poorest 50%. Even without Social Security, multimillionaires received almost two-thirds of the government transfers received by the poorest 50%. How is this possible?Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayA chart provided by The Atlantic-Corporation for Enterprise Development, gives 2014 data showing the total annual profit of video games property tax based on income. support. The data recovered was astonishing. In the United States, the poorest 20% of income brackets received $0.70 billion in annual benefits from homeownership tax programs. We compare that to the top 20% of income brackets in America, who received $69.9 billion in annual benefits from homeownership tax programs. There is a difference of 69 billion and 200 million dollars. How come we test the poor when they get so little money for property taxes, let alone cost of living, and we don't test the rich who get much more than what they need for their property taxes and not even starting how much extra money they already have. The chosen topic poses such a problem because there should be as much suspicion of drug use among the rich as among the poor, especially because of their abundance of money. Adam Chodorow comments: “After all, they actually receive more government assistance than Medicaid and welfare recipients. We want to check the consumption of narcotics.” Rep. Gwen Moore introduced the “Top 1% Accountability Act of 2016,” which requires drug testing for all tax filers claiming itemized deductions totaling more than $150,000. The bill would require those who take higher itemized deductions to submit a clear drug test to the IRS or take the standard deduction which is lower. The bill is meant to highlight the fact that it's not just the poor who receive help. Help for the wealthy mainly comes in the form of tax breaks, which allow them to keep whatever money they want when the law would otherwise require them to pay to the government. almost never tested positive. Who is to say that the rich use excess money from housing subsidies in a positive way? From everything you and I know, they're buying some eight-balls of cocaine right now. Maybe, a dime bag of OG Kush. It's scary to think that this might be true, but aren't rappers and rock stars the most famous for their drug use? Let the drugs test them too. Some may say that helping the poor is different. The reason we give benefits to the poor is to ensurethat they do not die of hunger and to help the unfortunate. The poor are limited in how they spend their money, such as food stamps, Medicade, and WIC. While there are no limits on where the excess money the rich receive goes and how it is spent. There is absolutely no reason why someone who is rich would really have a hard time taking a drug test to keep their government benefits if they are using their money properly and not using illegal drugs. House Speaker Paul Ryan outlined his anti-poverty plan at a news conference. drug rehab center in Anacostia, a neighborhood in Washington, DC. The announcement of the anti-poverty plan at a drug rehab center “is a continuation of this narrative that those who live day to day trying to find ways to make a living – those who live under poverty are somehow more susceptible to drug addiction than others.” Ryan said “this narrative needs to be squashed immediately.” “Rich Americans complain about the 'entitlements' given to the poor, but they continue to collect their own entitlements, to a degree the average American can only dream of. As the number of wealthy Americans increases relative to low-income Americans, they increasingly benefit from Medicare and Social Security. It has been proven by a study by the National Institutes of Health that high incomes are increasingly likely to receive benefits such as Social Security and Medicare over long periods of time compared to low incomes. Middle- and high-income Americans are even turning to Medicaid, due to the program's accommodating asset exclusion limits. According to the National Center for Policy Analysis, “15% of seniors in the middle income quintile receive Medicaid benefits, 8% in the top middle quintile receive benefits, and 5% in the top quintile receive Medicaid benefits. » Research was done by West's Encyclopedia of American Law which found that the poorest 20% of American households benefit from 3,000 tax entitlements. The richest 20% of American households benefit from at least $18,000 in taxes. Last but not least, the richest 1% of American households each receive more than $120,000 in taxes. Above all, there is an incredible array of significant tax breaks that primarily benefit well-positioned Americans. The mortgage interest deduction for second homes, which can even be a yacht or dream house, or an expensive car. Another benefit for a luxury home, with up to half a million dollars tax-free when a couple sells their home. Rental property deductions for homeowners, who are unlikely to be low-income. The $127,200 cap on Social Security taxes, which only benefits the richest 10 percent of Americans. Tax breaks on 401k accounts, which are less likely to be owned by low-income people. Financial support for higher education, particularly from prestigious universities which admit more students from families in the richest 1% than from the poorest 50% overall. Various fringe benefits, such as business meals, gambling loss deductions, tax preparation. Poor Americans are estimated to pay about 25 percent of total taxes, while the 1 percent pay between 18 and 23 percent. Rich Americans complain about “rights” given to the poor, but they continue 2016,.