In the small town of Maycomb, Alabama, two families stand out from the rest: the Cunninghams and the Ewells. Both families are known for their poverty and social status, but they have distinct differences that set them apart. This essay will explore the similarities and differences between the Cunninghams and the Ewells, shedding light on their backgrounds, behaviors, and attitudes. By examining these two families, we can better understand the dynamics within Maycomb society. The Cunninghams and the Ewells, despite their shared poverty, have contrasting backgrounds which contribute to their different behaviors. The Cunninghams, led by Walter Cunningham Sr., are hardworking farmers who strive to maintain their dignity despite their financial difficulties. They are known for their integrity and pride in their lands, often repaying debts through work or bartering goods. The Ewells, on the other hand, are known for their laziness and lack of ambition. Bob Ewell, the head of the family, relies on welfare to survive and does not hesitate to exploit the system for personal gain. This marked difference in work ethic stems from their respective family values ​​and upbringings. Additionally, the Cunninghams and the Ewells differ in their attitudes toward education and social interaction. The Cunninghams prioritize education and view it as a means to upward mobility. Even if they do not have the resources to attend school regularly, they value learning and encourage their children to make the most of their limited opportunities. In contrast, the Ewells show little interest in education, often keeping their children out of school to work or simply neglecting their educational needs. This disparity in attitude toward education further perpetuates the cycle of poverty in the Ewell family. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Additionally, the Cunninghams and the Ewells have contrasting reputations within Maycomb society. While both families are considered outcasts due to their low socioeconomic status, the Cunninghams are viewed with respect and sympathy. Their hardworking nature and willingness to help others, despite their own difficulties, earns them the admiration of their community. The Ewells, however, are seen as troublemakers and are generally looked down upon by the townspeople. Their dishonesty, laziness and involvement in criminal activities create a feeling of distrust and contempt towards them. The differing reputations of these families highlight the importance of personal choices and behavior in public perception. In conclusion, the Cunninghams and the Ewells may share a similar socioeconomic status, but the differences between these two families are evident in their backgrounds, behaviors, and attitudes. , and reputations. The Cunninghams' work ethic, value of education, and integrity set them apart from the Ewells, who were characterized by laziness, disregard for education, and dishonesty. While both families face poverty, the Cunninghams are respected and admired, while the Ewells are despised and distrusted. This examination of the Cunninghams and the Ewells provides valuable insight into the complexity of Maycomb society and the impact of individual choices on social status. Overall, the Cunninghams and the Ewells represent a microcosm of the broader social issues prevalent in Maycomb. Their differences highlight the importance of values, education and, 2015.