-
Essay / Critical Analysis of the Morales Incident
Table of ContentsIntroductionBodyReferencesThesis Statement: In this article, I will discuss the Morales Incident. I will identify some ethical, technical and economic problems. I will also identify stakeholders and certain social and political constraints on certain solutions. Finally, I will outline some alternative actions and evaluate them based on core ethical values. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essayIntroductionIntroduction: Ethical responsibilities endure beyond America's borders. Wherever engineers practice, they must prioritize the safety and health of the public. The professional duties of engineers extend beyond the contract with a client or client; the lives of workers and citizens are in their hands. Depending on social and economic conditions, this generally defines how an engineer performs his or her professional duties.BodyTopic Phrase: Ethics is a crucial element for business decision-making in engineering practices. Different engineers have different perspectives and may disagree with solutions when faced with difficult ethical questions. Some issues were resolved in the video through negotiations, but other ethical issues remained intact. In the video, Fred faced many challenges that tested his ethics. He neglected engineering ethics when making certain decisions. Evidence and Citation: An example of this was when Fred had to purchase materials for the construction of the factory. Due to cost reduction, Fred must decide whether to purchase either the cheaper materials or the more expensive materials. Chuck believed the project was feasible if cheaper materials were used, which would affect the quality of the plant. Fred did not consider the implications of substandard materials and insisted on purchasing substandard pipes and connectors. Comment: These inferior pipes and connectors were not capable of withstanding the extreme conditions in which they would be used. The group knows that this will most likely be a problem in the future, but Chuck states that the problem will no longer be with their hand and it will then be the manufacturer's problem. This is ethically wrong because the company should not deliberately blame problems on another department. Even if Chuck gives upper management what they want now within their budget, it won't benefit the company in the long run. If Fred had raised concerns about costs, the company might have improvised expenses rather than cutting costs. Topic Sentence: An environmental issue that emerged during the video concerned the potential impact of wastewater created by the factory. Evidence and Citation: Phaust neglected environmental ethics in designing the manufacturing plant in Mexico due to the lack of environmental laws. The company's desire to make a profit and dominate the market encouraged management to ignore ethics. Maria discovers the environmental implications the plant could have on the plant and water and begs Fred to have his tanks filled properly. Initially, he did not cover the evaporation ponds to stop the evaporation of dangerous chemicals, which is ethically wrong. Fred hesitated and didn't share his thoughts with Chuck or Wally at first. Luckily, Chuck eventually agrees to cover the tanks. When talking to Chuck before talking to Wally about it, Wally got angry with him...