Heart of a Dog: The Possibility of a 'New Soviet Man' and nicely familiar from this same model citizen in the visual propaganda of the pre-war USSR. Through the prism of social science fiction, Bulgakov could say that whatever changes, progressive or regressive, the communist regime might impose on the minds and bodies of the Russian people, they will come slowly and intermittently, and could very well be accompanied by unmanageable violence. This contrasts with the official narrative of Soviet agitprop, which called for a rapid and carefully controlled transformation of society. This narrative is particularly illustrated by tersely worded literacy campaigns and depictions of Russian workers physically and morally exalted to the point of hero worship. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Two aspects of Soviet citizenship that were most crucial to propagating and supporting the communist way of life received special attention in visual propaganda throughout the first decade of Stalinism: their impressionable voices and their hardworking bodies. From the perspective of 1925, as the ideology of these poster campaigns began to spread, Bulgakov can be seen as the creator of a prophetic satire on this growing cultural climate. The brief life of Sharikov the Dogman may not be an accurate allegory of the actions of a man of his time, for his attitudes are nowhere near as archetypal as those of the consummate bourgeois Preobrazhensky or the fervent socialist Shvonder. The scheming, dawdling, cat-chasing, and hustling he engages in throughout most of the book is largely apolitical. But the way in which the form and characteristics of Polygraf Polygrafovich develop undoubtedly reflects the way in which a “new Soviet man/woman” would be popularly represented in state-published texts and in the visual arts. During the novel, Bulgakov creates a dark mirror. to the enhanced linguistic and physical prowess of the idealized Stalinist subject with its depiction of Sharikov's transforming vulgar language and his evolution into a half-mixed, half-criminal body. The plot of the novel is primarily driven by Sharikov's instantaneous behavioral transitions from stubbornness to humanity. The operation that initiates Sharik's metamorphosis into Sharikov creates a tone of unpredictability that continues with each sudden acquisition of Russian phrases and human traits by the mismatched creature. In chapter four, when recounting the operation, Professor Philip Philippovitch notes that the dog has "already died five times" in the hands of his assistant, only to be resuscitated using adrenaline infusions. This cycle continues in the medical case study in the next chapter with alternating prognoses of rejuvenation and deterioration (54, 57). The dog's physical constitution only stabilizes once it exhibits its first sign of partial humanity, an obviously syllabic bark (57). From there, the medical narrative alternates from one journal entry to the next, focusing either on the surreal physical humanization of the dog ("elongation of the bones", through to "the dropped tail" , to “the structure of the body – entirely human”, 58-65) or on its increasingly coherent, but nevertheless confusing sentences (“tsurt-shif”, through “saloon”, to “leave me alone, lousy! and “Hey, Little Apple,” 58-62). The irregular flow of events and the necromantic air of this story cement the "evil" of the transfiguration of the grateful dog into a crude, party slogan-spewing tramp. The disquiet induced by the uncanny mode of this story, in which grotesque transformative acts reveal the incongruous nature of a literal "new man" in Soviet-language Russia, invites the reader to compare the nature of Sharikov's deeply ingrained Soviet attitudes with those that he could have learned or observed. The transformation scene draws a distinct parallel between Sharikov's "birth" and the popular creation of the "new Soviet man/woman": there is a dual emphasis on language and physicality in the construction of both the positive archetype of the poster and negative literary character. . In the archives of propaganda posters printed between 1920 and 1932, one can see that a remarkable number of those which focus on ordinary citizens rather than party leaders illustrate the new enthusiasm of ordinary people for literacy (Figs. A, B and C) and/or their greater willpower. physical vigor greater than reality (Fig. A, C, D, E, F and H). These graphic depictions of the country's most optimistic new subjects identify the Stalinist Russian definition of ideal people as those who continually strive to improve themselves physically and linguistically. Similarly, Sharikov is inaugurated as a “real man” in NEP Russia by his growth to a new stature and by his adoption of verbal skills, however incongruous they may seem. The crucial difference between Bulgakov's interpretation and that of the poster boys for a compliant Soviet system. persona, beyond the different senses of whether this social transformation is good for its subject's fellow human beings, concerns the rate at which such a (r)evolutionary character is supposed to develop. One of the characteristics of agitprop posters is a written order to act very quickly and without pause to achieve a goal set by the state, whether it is something as immediately achievable as joining a work group (Fig. H) or an aspiration as distant as learning to read (Fig. B) or obtaining an escape from impoverished suffering (Fig. G). Following the extreme example of Alexei Stakhanov, who in the course of a single day's work in 1935 was said to have transformed himself into a model coal miner, the implication is that a true Soviet citizen should be able to meet the demands of the party in favor of a new morality. , skills and goals in an instant (Fig. I). In contrast, we see Polygraf Polygrafovitch's tortured journey from street creature to sanitation worker and back again, a journey we see progress in fits and starts as he loses his fur. and acquires proletarian habits scene by scene. This story spontaneously suggests that the reality of the Soviet republics' new demands for upward mobility on the part of all their citizens was more likely to be fraught with difficulties than the narratives of Stakhanovism and rapid re-education allowed. In this way, Bulgakov's novel pokes holes in the official narrative of redefined individual morality and success, revealing a deeper truth about how society tended to (mal)function in the zeitgeist of society. NEP through an absurd and grotesquely parodic extension of the new national character. QuotedKeep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a personalized essay Bulgakov, Mikhail and Mirra Ginsburg. Dog heart. New 2016.. 2016.

Essay / Heart of a Dog: The Possibility of a 'New Soviet Man' and nicely familiar from this same model citizen in the visual propaganda of the pre-war USSR. Through the prism of social science fiction, Bulgakov could say that whatever changes, progressive or regressive, the communist regime might impose on the minds and bodies of the Russian people, they will come slowly and intermittently, and could very well be accompanied by unmanageable violence. This contrasts with the official narrative of Soviet agitprop, which called for a rapid and carefully controlled transformation of society. This narrative is particularly illustrated by tersely worded literacy campaigns and depictions of Russian workers physically and morally exalted to the point of hero worship. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay Two aspects of Soviet citizenship that were most crucial to propagating and supporting the communist way of life received special attention in visual propaganda throughout the first decade of Stalinism: their impressionable voices and their hardworking bodies. From the perspective of 1925, as the ideology of these poster campaigns began to spread, Bulgakov can be seen as the creator of a prophetic satire on this growing cultural climate. The brief life of Sharikov the Dogman may not be an accurate allegory of the actions of a man of his time, for his attitudes are nowhere near as archetypal as those of the consummate bourgeois Preobrazhensky or the fervent socialist Shvonder. The scheming, dawdling, cat-chasing, and hustling he engages in throughout most of the book is largely apolitical. But the way in which the form and characteristics of Polygraf Polygrafovich develop undoubtedly reflects the way in which a “new Soviet man/woman” would be popularly represented in state-published texts and in the visual arts. During the novel, Bulgakov creates a dark mirror. to the enhanced linguistic and physical prowess of the idealized Stalinist subject with its depiction of Sharikov's transforming vulgar language and his evolution into a half-mixed, half-criminal body. The plot of the novel is primarily driven by Sharikov's instantaneous behavioral transitions from stubbornness to humanity. The operation that initiates Sharik's metamorphosis into Sharikov creates a tone of unpredictability that continues with each sudden acquisition of Russian phrases and human traits by the mismatched creature. In chapter four, when recounting the operation, Professor Philip Philippovitch notes that the dog has "already died five times" in the hands of his assistant, only to be resuscitated using adrenaline infusions. This cycle continues in the medical case study in the next chapter with alternating prognoses of rejuvenation and deterioration (54, 57). The dog's physical constitution only stabilizes once it exhibits its first sign of partial humanity, an obviously syllabic bark (57). From there, the medical narrative alternates from one journal entry to the next, focusing either on the surreal physical humanization of the dog ("elongation of the bones", through to "the dropped tail" , to “the structure of the body – entirely human”, 58-65) or on its increasingly coherent, but nevertheless confusing sentences (“tsurt-shif”, through “saloon”, to “leave me alone, lousy! and “Hey, Little Apple,” 58-62). The irregular flow of events and the necromantic air of this story cement the "evil" of the transfiguration of the grateful dog into a crude, party slogan-spewing tramp. The disquiet induced by the uncanny mode of this story, in which grotesque transformative acts reveal the incongruous nature of a literal "new man" in Soviet-language Russia, invites the reader to compare the nature of Sharikov's deeply ingrained Soviet attitudes with those that he could have learned or observed. The transformation scene draws a distinct parallel between Sharikov's "birth" and the popular creation of the "new Soviet man/woman": there is a dual emphasis on language and physicality in the construction of both the positive archetype of the poster and negative literary character. . In the archives of propaganda posters printed between 1920 and 1932, one can see that a remarkable number of those which focus on ordinary citizens rather than party leaders illustrate the new enthusiasm of ordinary people for literacy (Figs. A, B and C) and/or their greater willpower. physical vigor greater than reality (Fig. A, C, D, E, F and H). These graphic depictions of the country's most optimistic new subjects identify the Stalinist Russian definition of ideal people as those who continually strive to improve themselves physically and linguistically. Similarly, Sharikov is inaugurated as a “real man” in NEP Russia by his growth to a new stature and by his adoption of verbal skills, however incongruous they may seem. The crucial difference between Bulgakov's interpretation and that of the poster boys for a compliant Soviet system. persona, beyond the different senses of whether this social transformation is good for its subject's fellow human beings, concerns the rate at which such a (r)evolutionary character is supposed to develop. One of the characteristics of agitprop posters is a written order to act very quickly and without pause to achieve a goal set by the state, whether it is something as immediately achievable as joining a work group (Fig. H) or an aspiration as distant as learning to read (Fig. B) or obtaining an escape from impoverished suffering (Fig. G). Following the extreme example of Alexei Stakhanov, who in the course of a single day's work in 1935 was said to have transformed himself into a model coal miner, the implication is that a true Soviet citizen should be able to meet the demands of the party in favor of a new morality. , skills and goals in an instant (Fig. I). In contrast, we see Polygraf Polygrafovitch's tortured journey from street creature to sanitation worker and back again, a journey we see progress in fits and starts as he loses his fur. and acquires proletarian habits scene by scene. This story spontaneously suggests that the reality of the Soviet republics' new demands for upward mobility on the part of all their citizens was more likely to be fraught with difficulties than the narratives of Stakhanovism and rapid re-education allowed. In this way, Bulgakov's novel pokes holes in the official narrative of redefined individual morality and success, revealing a deeper truth about how society tended to (mal)function in the zeitgeist of society. NEP through an absurd and grotesquely parodic extension of the new national character. QuotedKeep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a personalized article from our expert writers now. Get a personalized essay Bulgakov, Mikhail and Mirra Ginsburg. Dog heart. New 2016.. 2016.

Navigation

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Get In Touch