-
Essay / Effective Leadership: Analysis of Martin Luther King, The Modern Prometheus and Rabbit Proof Fence
What does it mean to be a leader? Do you need power over millions like Hitler during World War II, or is leadership a position earned, not given? To make the question even more complex, what does it mean to lead effectively? This part of the mission statement has had the greatest impact and effect on the way I live in Wabash. Through the use of Martin Luther King Jr., The Modern Prometheus, and Rabbit Proof Fences, I hope to understand a little of what it means to demonstrate effective leadership, even in the face of adversity. By finding examples from texts and films, I intend to analyze the key elements found among natural leaders and what they do effectively. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essay Martin Luther King Jr. was one of the most influential and powerful speakers of the 20th century, his nonviolent protests and leadership skills led African Americans during the civil rights movement. During our lingering question period, MLK was the topic of our first discussions. The opposition he faced was immense, and yet, even in these troubled times, he found the courage to stand up for justice among black people. One of the first times we met for EQ, we watched an interview with Meet the Press: MLK, in that talk, MLK was pitted against four men who questioned his motives. The normal person would have a hard time answering any of these complex questions without losing patience, but MLK remained collected and answered knowledgeably. Thanks to his responses, Dr. King was able to gain even more acclaim for his already stellar career. Much like MLK, another figure who faced daily opposition was Jesus when dealing with the Pharisees. The Pharisees clashed with the followers of Christ and made normal life difficult, similar to the conflict black people had with white segregationists. The situations are quite similar and more so, the way both reacted, MLK was able to give answers that baffled people who questioned his motives. And looking at the time when the Pharisees and Sadducees came to Jesus seeking answers, Jesus responds in a way where the Pharisees cannot come back with anything to answer. One conversation from the interview was: "Isn't this an indication that sit-in strikes are doing more harm than good to the race, to the black race?" (King 428)” to which MLK responds: “Now, I don’t think this movement will set us back or make us enemies; this is causing many people across the country, and in the South in particular, to re-evaluate the stereotypes they have developed about black people, to give them educational value, and I think in the long run this will transform the whole of American society. . (King 428) » By establishing this standard, he wants to prove that he will not back down in the face of adversity. Even former President Truman was against him and yet he persevered. The characteristics of a leader are very evident in the way MLK presents himself in his speeches and actions. No matter how many people opposed him, he knew there was a goal to be achieved, something to come, maybe not a clear ending but a vision of a better future. His use of non-violent protests also added to his record: his people were beaten, murdered, mocked and many other atrocities. People may wonder why follow aperson who can put his life in danger, MLK proposed something that people would die for, just like the deep-rooted patriotism of dying for our country in times of war, there was an emotional call to help MLK during the movement of civil rights. This power to persuade not only his supporters but also those who despised him shows how gifted he was at leading effectively, as his words still resonate today. I will then talk about an anti-hero, someone who could have used effective leadership but failed and, as a result, ruined the life of not only himself but also those who loved him. Victor, as we know, was a curious child who grew up and, after several years of research, developed a way to revive life. Frankenstein's monster was created, but there seemed to be no motive behind the creation, only to create the monster, but he didn't think any further. Victor even surprised himself when the monster came to life because he had doubted his work for so long. But at that moment, Victor had two choices: either raise the monster with good morals, or panic and disown him. We know that the monster is fleeing Victor, an innocent creation left apart from society and left to its own devices. Without a leader, the monster learned from what he experienced: harshness, anger, brutality and sadness. As stated earlier, this novel is a testament to how not to lead others. As if it were a generational problem, Victor also had leadership problems. Growing up, he hardly had the opportunity to interact and develop a close relationship with his parents, so he devoted his time to other things. After rejecting the monster and ruining his life, Victor can only feel responsible for his actions. By not becoming an indispensable leader or parental figure, you create an unstable environment and inhibit growth. Of course the monster didn't have to become evil, but what choice do we have when no one accepts him and everyone despises him. Victor and the Monster is about someone who made his own biography/novel, A Child Called It. In this film, a child is abused and tortured throughout his early childhood, without ever having a stable path or leadership and despite all the negative aspects, the man becomes a leader. How is it that some situations that have similar beginnings end so differently? From my point of view, people have two perspectives on life. It can either get better or worse. The monster, through multiple rejections, only learned hatred and, therefore, got worse, but in the case of the child who was abused, he only saw the good and how life s would improve. Although perspective is at the heart of this comparison, I believe leadership is important in both cases. To illustrate leadership even better, I will now discuss another way of doing it. Leading effectively is doing the right thing, no matter who is watching. Take a position or action that leads to a positive outcome. In Rabbit Proof Fences, the theme of leadership is also apparent, as a girl must bring her sister and cousin home. Along the way, Molly's split-second decisions kept the tracker away from them. As in the film, I also think that a great leader, to be effective, must be able to react and respond under pressure. As I mentioned earlier, I believe that a place of leadership should be earned, not given. An old saying I heard, if a man says "I am a king", in fact he is not a king. This means that you cannot just take a leadership position and expect people to respect you and work for you,.