blog




  • Essay / The College Athlete Compensation Debate

    The discussion over whether college athletes should be paid has been resurrected several times. There are those in favor and many against the idea of ​​paying athletes to play sports for their colleges. There are many reasons why people believe college athletes should be rewarded. For example, a college athlete spends his time training. There are many reasons why student athletes should not be paid. The discussion highlights reasons why payment should not be made. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayCollege sports programs can't afford to pay athletes; colleges don't have enough money to pay all the athletes. If colleges pay athletes, they wouldn't be allowed to pay some students and leave others, or pay for some sports and have their way with others. That wouldn't be fair. Every athlete will demand payment, making it difficult to allocate money to college athletes. They can also pay athletes and the sports season generates negative revenue. If colleges end up paying their players, it will result in demanding more of what the college can offer. There is no fair way to compensate college athletes. Some people think that payment should be based on the free market system. When that happens, then demand and supply will fall into place, and the college will be able to pay the player based on the revenue generated from his talents. The payout will end up varying depending on the deal each player makes with the school and the local market. If the school pays the high student rate, this may harm it, and if such payment is not provided in the future, disagreement between the players and management may arise. Determining the player's value begs the question because the signing can be done at a lower rate and improves considerably as the season goes on. The fact remains that each college may not be able to hire the player it wants because it cannot afford it. Students are not professionals; students are not supposed to be forced into the role of practitioners. College is a place of learning, and whether the student wants to become a professional athlete or a doctor, they do not become a professional while they are still in school. Students should not receive salaries like professionals since they are not. The fact is, student athletes should view their college sports solely as a vehicle that leads them to higher education. The bottom line remains: a student-athlete is a mere amateur like a nursing student who chooses to participate in the educational experience. Since this is the case, it doesn't matter how many touchdowns the students score, because they are not professionals and should not be making professional money. College students are financially irresponsible for getting paid. Adding money to these students' lives will accelerate more problems. A student does not understand proper cash management since most cannot keep a budget. Some also indulge in luxury activities which end up draining all the money. Access to lots of money drives these players crazy by creating purses without proper consideration. Paying college athletes will ruin college sports. Once they get paid, the gaming industry in, 36(1), 68-88.