When there is a crime, many areas of the criminal justice system are involved in resolving the outcome. One of the main areas of concern is police accountability. The essay defines whether the justice system can be held accountable for deviations from its goals and values ​​when resolving such cases, a question of accountability. When investigating highly controversial issues and events, it is pertinent to question narratives of the truth, whether there is a possibility that there is a definitive and definitive version of the truth or, in the face of narratives contradictory, who should believe this story. When policing systems are inadequate to the circumstances, it is essential to be able to differentiate between organizational and individual responsibility and the means to counter it. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on 'Why violent video games should not be banned'?Get the original essayThe most current system for complaints against the police is the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC), established in 2018 from the Police and Crime Act, which replaced the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), established in 2004 from the Police Reform Act of 2002. The IPCC is born of numerous calls for change within the system, including the Macpherson inquiry into the murder of black teenager Stephen Lawrence and general questioning. of the police department itself. Before the introduction of the IPCC, the primary police complaints system was the Police Complaints Authority (PCA), but the system struggled to achieve any form of credibility. To counter this, the IPCC and IOPC place a strong emphasis on their independence due to the fact that they are not part of any government department and are completely independent of the police service. Features of the IPCC and the IOPC Fund include that they can both independently investigate, manage or supervise investigations into all deaths following police contact and other serious allegations and that the investigators involved have all the powers of a police officer. The duty of these organizations is to improve the handling of complaints by the police, increase confidence in the system and ultimately determine where accountability lies within the system. When it comes to the police department itself and its ability to cause deaths, under law and policy it is an individual. the responsibility of the police officer to decide whether to shoot or not and by the Criminal Law Act “A person may use reasonable force to prevent crime”. In the case of Jean Charles de Menezes (JCDM) and his shooting assassination on July 22, 2005, this was not the case. In response to 4 previous suicide bombings and 4 other failed attack attempts, police have developed tactics for special circumstances, including a system called Operation Kratos, this operation allows police to fire without warning in an attempt to incapacitate the target. According to this operation, instead of the decision of an individual officer, the decision to shoot rests on the command of the designated senior officer, in this case Cressida Dick. The police identified one of the suicide bombers as Hussain Osman and chose to monitor his address and question residents. The surveillance team arrives before the shooting team and there are not enough officers to question everyone, JCDM leaves the scene without being identified as a possible suspect. Surveillance officers spot JCDM and identify him as matching Osman's description and follow him in abus. JCDM leaves the bus to go to the metro station which is closed and therefore gets back on the bus, but his movement is interpreted as an act of anti-surveillance and the agents are convinced that he is the suspect. Once at the subway station, Cressida Dick states "arrest him" to the surveillance officers who ask what to do, as the senior officer designated with the order to shoot this comment is extremely ambiguous under the circumstances. JCDM gets on the subway and is surrounded by officers, gun crews arrive in the subway station and approach JCDM, he gets up to exit the tube without realizing the situation but is pushed back force and then shot 11 times in the head with 8 shots hitting him. After the attack, public witnesses are interviewed and a member of the public provides the account in which he interpreted 3 firearms officers running into the station as instead being 2 firearms officers pursuing a target and this broadcast then was taken as fact by Scotland Yard. The director of Scotland Yard gives an interview, repeating as fact the story given on television, thus delivering completely inaccurate information to the public and the press. The affair was not conducted in an orderly manner but was the result of panic and chaos. As a result, the head of the Ministry of the Interior asks the IPCC not to investigate the case, but the IPCC tries to retaliate for control, and this delay in referring the case to the investigation file creates a suspicion. The IPCC was not effective in this case, recently created in 2004, the system had only been in place for a year and was new and inexperienced and faced with conflicting accounts from officers, agents were slow to collaborate with their notes and inaccurate information was presented. According to them by the Metropolitan Police Station, many features made this a difficult investigation which ultimately led the IPCC to draw no conclusions as to responsibility. In cases where police are armed and make potentially fatal errors, public trust in these authorities can be seriously compromised. mine. Structures that help ensure accountability involve procedures such as reviews, which Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) intends to do. In the public interest, HMIC provides independent assessments of the effectiveness and efficiency of policing, interpreting evidence to make recommendations for improvement based on the questions the public wishes to answer. They assess the Police Effectiveness, Efficiency and Legitimacy (PEEL) of the 43 police forces in Wales and Wales by bringing together evidence from annual inspections of all forces. For example, emerging themes from the 2018-19 report welcomed the use of digital technology to achieve faster responses and increased knowledge and awareness of protecting people with mental health, but also noted that some strengths had inexperienced and underqualified officers investigating high-volume crimes without proper supervision, which was a concern. Furthermore, in 1951, the establishment of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ECHR), followed by the Human Rights Act, has generally provided a very solid legal framework for authorities, which would hold them accountable for their human rights actions. occasion when the authorities violated their rights. The IPCC also considers human rights law when investigating complaints of police misconduct. The HMIC and the CEDH provide »..