All over the world, all types of people need education, whether it is compulsory or not. During their studies, students learned a lot, not only traditional subjects, but also practical skills needed for work. Particularly, in this following essay on educational equity, we will explain some factors that influence the adaptation of schools and the real education system of the United Kingdom. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an Original Essay First of all, when it comes to education, two theories are often put forward. One is functionalism, which presents a positive aspect of education. He emphasizes that “education is quite similar to the liver of our body”, meaning that education plays a special role in our society. Emile Durkheim, sociologist in 1858, maintains that when students are educated in a school, social solidarity is essential. In other words, social unity. And every child should have essential similarities. For example, in the Republic of Korea, primary school students take an oath in front of their flag during the morning assembly on the first Monday. But the meeting with similarities cannot be said to be valid today. In England in particular, there is a multicultural school and society. It seems quite difficult to have social solidarity for children because they have different origins and histories, etc. Education helps children in many ways. An example is that the main function of a school is the distribution of roles highlighted by Talcott Parsons, a sociologist. The distribution of roles means that young students can be helped to choose their job or place of work at school by assessing them through exams. By testing their abilities, it can inspire students to develop their passion for studies. Not only the distribution of roles, but school can also become a bridge that could give a virtual society experience before young children enter real life. However, considering functionalism, they tend to ignore the critical view of education. In comparison, Marxists have a pessimistic view of the education system. One reason is that many schools in the UK let their students suffer such brainwashing in the future, without them being aware of the exploitative condition. In addition to exploitative conditions and political education, teachers indoctrinated students to have a biased opinion on the political issue. At a school in Kent, an opinion poll was held among students on the “Politburo at the height of the Soviet Empire”. They responded that “left” meant the “NHS – National Health Service” and that the theory held that “everyone should be equal”. While the “right” defines itself as “Hitler”, “less help to people” and support for inequality. The reason for these responses is that teachers have taught students by indoctrinating them with prejudices. Furthermore, schools provide diligent disciplines for corporate capitalism. With the exception of all capitalist worlds, including England, students are encouraged to accept this type of education system without any hesitation. This is the so-called Ideological State Apparatus (ISA) that conducted Louis Althusser's study. There is a correspondence between social relations in classrooms and those in the workplace. For example, in school, those who are obedient students are likely to become submissive workers whilethat a student who is not interested in study but in qualification tends to be a worker who prioritizes salary (money) rather than the products sought by Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis in 1976. If the theory of Marxism is to be believed, it would say that it is definitely unfair for working class students to receive an education in Britain. Interestingly, functionalists argue that society and education are linked to meritocracy. Meritocracy is one in which people can succeed and power depends on their talents, abilities and hard work in giving equal and fair opportunities, not on their position and class. Therefore, the school helps students to have equal opportunities to succeed and obtain a good qualification. They have no doubt that working-class students can achieve high positions, regardless of their background, if they strive to study hard. On the other hand, people who are on the side of Marxism strongly oppose meritocracy. They believe that “meritocracy is a myth” because of the correspondence with Marxism. In reality, meritocracy cannot be adopted in the education system. If the first generation is wealthy and has enough material and cultural factors to support their child, then the second generation is likely to be wealthy like their parents. However, lower class children have an extreme tendency to become working class children. Most believe that only the education system is responsible for this phenomenon. Certainly not, teachers also have responsibility. The University of Birmingham study of 14,000 students, including six countries and England, questions the fairness of teacher favoritism. More than half a percent of them disagree with the idea that guardians treat them absolutely fairly. Moderators working at the Department of Education found that two-thirds of teachers said “personal feelings about certain students influenced their evaluations” each time they graded essays. There is another study in support of Marxism, Paul Willis' research titled "Learning to Work" showed that students, those who reject the education system by spoiling and making the classroom atmosphere laugh, do not try not to concentrate the study. These guys are called by guys. The guys do not fully accept the ideology and refuse the "brainwashing" that makes them obedient both at school and at work. These situations make up the counter-curricular culture. Implying the anti-school culture, children might not be interested in their future jobs. And this would lead to the definition of British education being unfair. One aspect that could play a central role in the education system is support for resources such as cultural capital. Middle-class parents usually pay a lot of attention to what their children should do by associating with the school principal or guardians. Some of these parents come together to get resources and information about education. Douglas investigated parents who belong to a different class. The result was that the more focused they were on children's study, the higher their child could achieve high grades such as GCSEs and A-levels. Parental education can affect children's verbal ability, and language is one of the cultural capitals. There are two different types of languages, restricted code and elaborate code. The restricted code states that when children speak with their family or friends