Corporate social responsibility, some may say that it is the duty of an organization to behave in an economically and environmentally acceptable manner, but there are more than this. A company has a duty to its shareholders, a duty to maximize profits and avoid problems, a responsibility to employees and others who depend on that company for their livelihood, and last but not least, it has a duty to create a safe environment for everyone. . A Civil Action by Jonathan Harr describes a civil trial taking place in the United States. The lawsuit is filed by residents of a small town, Woburn, Massachusetts, against two powerful corporations, Beatrice Foods and WR Grace, for polluting local river water with carcinogenic TCE and causing the deaths of many children. A civil suit by Jonathan Harr demonstrates that the issue of corporate social responsibility is prominent throughout the work, but due to the adversarial legal system, there is no room for excuses, just winning for the two parts. In a civil action, corporate social responsibility cannot be proven. because there is too much morality involved in this matter, especially on the part of the people and Jan Schitmann. According to The Business Ethics Workshop, v.10, there are three forms of corporate social responsibility: Corporate Social Responsibility, Triple Bottom Line and Stakeholders (1). In corporate social responsibility, there is economic responsibility, legal responsibility, ethical responsibility and philanthropic responsibility. These four components of social responsibility involve different key events, dialogues or descriptions that appear throughout the play. Furthermore, these four components help to prove that these companies cannot be kept surrounded by paperwork and lack of rigor. One of the most asked questions is: what does it mean to say that a “company” has responsibilities? A business is an artificial thing, that is, it has artificial responsibilities, but the “business” as a whole cannot have responsibilities, even in a vague sense. To understand what it means to have responsibilities, we must examine the doctrine of corporate social responsibility and ask who exactly it refers to. No tangible responsibility can be attributed to an inanimate building. Presumably, the individuals who should be responsible for this are the bosses, that is, the individual owners or managers of the company. Most of the debate about social responsibility is directed at businesses. In what follows, we therefore mainly neglect individual owners and talk about business managers because they are in charge...