Kolb proposed a theory that has been widely used today. In his study, he proposed the learning cycle theory that we learn from the experience we gain during our daily activities. In this sense, the theory tends to consider reflection as an essential element of this learning. In 1984, David Kolb developed the Learning Style Inventory from his then-published Earnings Style Model. Kolb's theory works on the basis of two separate levels in a cycle consisting of four stages of learning as well as a second level consisting of four distinct learning styles. It refers to learning as the process of acquiring abstract concepts that can be applied flexibly in multiple situations. Kobl therefore believed that the learning process is where the creation of knowledge occurs through the process of transforming experience. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay It has been noted that success always emerges from a group composed of many learning styles (Bergsteiner and Avery, p257). It has been proven by research that a homogeneous group composed of any learning style learns less than a heterogeneous group composed of several learning styles. Through research, it has also been established that randomly forming a team with multiple learners yields better results than self-selected studies (Bergsteiner and Avery, p257). This helps teachers know that the group is made up of all types of students, which helps in preparing the student's instructional units that include different teaching strategies (Bergsteiner and Avery, p257). The model, however, presents a number of problems despite its applicability and improved performance, particularly in higher education institutions (Murphy, p64). This experimental model is never applicable in all situations. The theory, however, only concerns a few factors involved in the learning process. The model is also never applicable to the institutional, social and psychodynamic aspects of learning. The styles involved in this theory are associated with lack of validity, reliability and objectivity (Kinsella, p277). Its use in limited cultures also makes it associated with generalization that makes it unsuitable for other cultures. Through the use of Kolb's learning cycle, I had the opportunity to take stock of my professional experience. I have been lucky enough to experiment with different coaching styles best suited to any group or individual which has helped me break down barriers with people with a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 when of the handicap football session (McDonald and Boud, p209). I was able to learn that every individual needs a good coach who can adapt to all their participants and understand the best coaching style to employ that will suit everyone they have to coach. I will be able to plan my future sessions knowing that sessions that work for a certain group may not be applicable to other groups, unless they are modified to fit a group or group. individual. For example, I was able to understand that sessions that work for people with disabilities might not work for people without disabilities unless otherwise noted. If the disabled person in this case is deaf, a normal person would have difficulty adapting to sessions where only sign languages ​​are used. HAS?