“I don’t agree with what you have to say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it,” a quote giving the point of many people's view of freedom of expression. This quote gives an example of a different view that some may have on this topic and provides insight into the true meaning of free speech; and why it is a natural right for us all. The purpose of free speech is not so that you can understand what everyone has to say, but so that you understand that everyone has the right to say it. Understanding means accepting the fact that what is said makes sense to the speaker and that they truly believe in what they say. Understanding why anyone can say whatever they want is about speaking freely, not if you agree with what someone says. With any other amendment, right or law, there will always be some sort of violation. Some examples: shouting fire in a crowd around a speech or threatening the life of someone who disagrees with your speech. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original essayFree speech is controversial due to many diverse approaches. Some different approaches that can transform the view of freedom of expression are: culture, religion, opinions, race and history. Free speech is an umbrella term that gives us many rights that allow us to say whatever we want, but does not give us the right to abuse those privileges. Freedom of expression allows us to express what we think however we choose. However, freedom of speech does not allow you to directly or indirectly threaten someone. Liberals being the ones who “stifle” diversity on university campuses, they have relied heavily on their category. Liberals are considered those who influence diversity because of their open minds. Conservatives are seen as those who hate everything and everyone except themselves. This stuff is said in the name of both groups, but how can we trust what is being said, especially with all the influence produced by social media. The community has the right to have its own opinions, but it also has the right to share its own opinions. The free speech argument, in this case, focuses on free speech on campus. It is argued that free speech on campus does not meet the requirements of the First Amendment, of course, from the perspective of students and other residents. Free speech is not a privilege that is taken away from you when you get out of your car or when you take a job. Being afraid of losing your job when you express your opinion is wrong and this system itself should be overhauled. Whether you are a teacher or a receptionist in a dentist's office, in either case you still have your natural rights; your right to your truth is self-evident and that all men are created equal. That being said, you do not give up your right to free speech when you enter a campus. Freedom of speech itself is very vague and is sometimes misinterpreted. How one uses free speech is also very vague due to the various distributions or deliveries of one's “free speech”. Using offensive language and/or symbolic gestures is sometimes necessary to get your opinion across. Every person is unique, which means that everyone's idea of ​​freedom of expression changes. There is no one side on free speech, because some “free speech” is dangerous.