The National Sexual Violence Resource Center reported in 2015 that one in five women and one in seventy-one men will be sexually assaulted in the United States at least once times in their life. They further break it down by sexual orientation, race, and nationality to further prove that the issue of sexual assault is not limited by any of the characteristics mentioned above. Sexual assault is defined as any unwanted sexual advances which can range from insults to touching and rape. Currently, the name of the accused is made public while the name of the accuser remains confidential to protect their privacy. This begs the question: is this fair? Many have argued that to truly protect victims of sexual assault, the name of the accused should be published in order to draw attention to the case and the topic, bring awareness to more victims, and ensure a sense of justice, and to ensure that the topic of sexual assault is raised and corrected in every way possible. However, I believe that the name of the accused should remain private until his conviction or absence, thereby protecting not only the sanctity of the justice system, the accused from false accusations that could harm not only his career but also to his mental health. health, and increase sensitivity and respect towards victims and the subject in general due to the immediate decrease in evidence that could be used to prevent victims from finding resources and clinics in order to seek help. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay In the United States specifically, the justice system is often tainted by societal pressures shaped by contemporary media, popular culture, and hidden political agendas. . This has led many to advocate for journalists to take the reins and publish stories to bring attention to the ongoing problem of sexual assault and its victims. Usually, the media attempts to focus attention on the specific person who is accused and their life journey, not just the topic of sexual assault and its aftermath. While in some cases it can be argued that it is important to examine an individual's past in order to understand their motivations, in cases of sexual assault in the media, the press does not do this to prove motive or intention. but rather to attract the attention of all possible media. This means that, especially in cases involving celebrities, the jury does not have the opportunity to be impartial, thus leading to a biased decision by the court. The focus on athletes, influencers, and other celebrities, in person and online, means people have preconceived notions about their lifestyle and morality when it comes to sexual assault or other inherently violent crimes . So when the press publishes the name of the accused sex offender, notices will be given immediately, even without all the facts, as can be seen daily on social media platforms. The court's decision must be based entirely on the facts associated with the case, and justice must be done in a way that ensures not only that the accused actually committed the crime and was not falsely accused, but that he is found guilty, he will serve his sentence. the appropriate time limit or have consequences that coincide with the seriousness of the crime. Thus, the best and only way to ensure that the matter is handled efficiently and effectively is to.