Indian Education System: Private School vs. Public School by 35%, from 0.22 million in 2010-11 to 0.30 million in 2015-16 – while the number of public schools increased by only 1%, from 1.03 million to 1, 04 million. According to Gandhi, small public schools (with 20 students or less) and small ones (with 50 students or less) are being abandoned. Over the past five years, the number of small public schools has increased by 52% and the number of small public schools by 33.7%. No less than 5,044 public schools had no students during the 2015-2016 year, an increase of 14% compared to the 4,435 public schools in 2010-2011. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay The migration of students from public schools has rendered many of them non-competent, with high per-student spending and low ratio quality-price of public schools. education expenses. Around 24,000 government schools in Rajasthan, Maharashtra and Chhattisgarh have closed their doors. West Bengal saw a 280% increase in the number of small schools – more than any other state – followed by Madhya Pradesh (225%) and Jharkhand (131%). However, Bihar bucked the national trend by reporting a 98% decline in the number of small schools. Government. Indian teachers earn four times more than those in China, but their results are worse. Indian government teachers earn more than their counterparts in private schools, but also in other countries. Despite being paid at least four times the salary of teachers in China, Indian teachers' performance, judged by students' level of understanding, was poor on the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) test. ) in 2009, India ranked 73rd. and China ranks second out of 74 countries. PISA is a global study conducted by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in member and non-member countries on the academic achievement of 15-year-old students in mathematics, science and reading. Comparison of Indian education system with foreign countries. educational systemIndian education focuses more on theory than practice. This does not allow creativity. Whereas abroad; they prioritize hands-on learning more. And they let creativity into education. Education is a formality for every Indian. They must obtain a degree in engineering or medicine; whether they learned anything or not. In foreign countries, education is considered a learning process. Their program includes everything from arts to sports to academics. The United States offers arts, sports, music and theater in its programs. Australia is focusing more on sport; they have cricket, hockey and boxing in their academic program. Whereas, in the Indian education system, the focus is only on studies. There is no place for extracurriculars in our system. In Dubai: primary and secondary education is free and made compulsory by law. Whereas in India, education is a thriving industry. From privatization of education to tuition fees and coaching institutes. Education generates a lot of money in the economy In India, students do not have a choice to choose their field of interest. You have to become an engineer or a doctor! Sports and the arts are considered to be for scraps. If you are not admitted to thebusiness science sector; you choose the arts. This is what Indians feel. In India; students are admitted to majors that have a higher salary scale or a higher number of jobs. And in a foreign country; Students are admitted based on their area of interest. In India; students are admitted by seeing the trends. So, if in a given year, the majority of students rush into mechanical engineering, you are bound to get admission into mechanical engineering. Students do not have the choice to select their area of specialty. In short in India; we go with the flow. Whereas, like in foreign countries, students wait to get admission in their field of study.interest. Students must memorize facts and figures. Thousands of mathematical equations, birth and death dates of freedom fighters, chemical reactions and hundreds of other things. We emphasize theory. And in foreign countries, they impact students' knowledge through practical implementation. The Indian education system teaches old technologies. The education system did not change much after independence. Indian education system is very bad in adopting latest technology in school curriculum. In foreign countries; The syllabus changes every day according to the upgradation of technology and industry requirements. And finally, we believe in grades and certificates. We believe in admission to IITs and IIMs. Foreign countries believe in skills. They don't care more about the educational institution, all they see is what you learned during your schooling. Problems and Challenges Facing Indian Education System Education Expenditure In terms of expenditure incurred on education, especially for higher education, during the year In 2010-11, the government spent around 15,440 million rupees, or about 85 percent of the revised budget estimates for the year. The recent 66th NSSO survey reveals that between 1999 and 2009, spending on education in general jumped by 378 percent in rural areas and 345 percent in urban areas of the country. The survey further reveals that spending on children's education is seeing a sharp increase – 63 percent for rural families and 73 percent for urban families. However, if we measure education spending as a percentage of GDP, India lags behind some developed/developing countries. We recognize that the education investment gap in India can perhaps be bridged by the crucial role of the private sector. At present, in India, there are around 1.86 million students enrolled in various higher education streams, including business management.3 Despite the large number of students studying in various streams, we We have not seen a major change in productivity because skills and talents are deficient. to support economic activities and hence there are serious concerns about the employability of these educated people. The gross enrollment ratio (GER) in higher education in India was 12 percent in 2010. However, the level of enrollment varies across states. We must also recognize that our level of registration is much lower than that of many other countries. For example, according to one report, the GER is 23 percent for China, 34 percent for Brazil, 57 percent for the United Kingdom, 77 percent for Australia and Russia and 83 percent for UNITED STATES. In this context, the attempt by government authorities to increase the number of students by 2020 in order to achieve a GERof 30 percent becomes a significant challenge. No, the launch of new institutes like JRE School of Management can play a catalytic role in meeting the challenge of increasing GER in India. As a positive step, for the remaining duration of the Eleventh Five Year Plan, the government has taken initiatives to encourage states to establish/expand existing educational institutions, establish 8 universities and expand colleges to achieve a target registration of one million students. and projects to create model colleges in regions whose GER is below the national average. Capacity UtilizationAnother challenge in strengthening the Indian education system is to improve capacity utilization. For example, a recent study on capacity utilization in India for higher education indicates that capacity utilization in case of MBA is around 57 per cent in Maharashtra and 72 per cent in Haryana. In some states, there are many vacant seats in institutions. On the one hand, we need to improve our GER and on the other hand, we need to ensure that the institutions/colleges/schools established to provide higher education make full use of the capacities created. Infrastructure is one of the factors why capacity utilization is low in number of upcoming/new institutions/colleges (both in private and public sectors) is their inability to provide the physical infrastructure required for the functioning of the institutions. Desirable infrastructure for ranking higher quality institutions includes real estate, state-of-the-art classrooms, library, hostels, furniture, sports facilities, transportation, commercial buildings, etc. We must ensure apolitical participation of the private sector in the establishment of colleges to provide quality physical infrastructure. PPP Model The government is making efforts to improve the education system in terms of various parameters such as GER, quality, investments, infrastructure, etc. But we must recognize the constraints on government to make a big turnaround with huge investments in education. We believe that the private sector has started playing a distinctive role in improving the education system in India. In this context, it is useful to explore the possibility of a public-private partnership (PPP) model in education. This will not only reduce the burden on the government in terms of high costs of providing basic infrastructure but also lead to the construction of state-of-the-art buildings, laboratories, libraries, hostels, etc. companies would help in organizing joint research and development, enabling students to be exposed to industrial activities in terms of internships, corporate training during vacations and issuance of certificates by companies for participating in internship/ training, etc. and, thus, facilitate the construction of the image and branding of institutions. and make students more job worthy. Student-Teacher Ratio Another challenge to improve the Indian education system is to improve the student-teacher ratio. In India, this ratio is very high compared to some comparable countries in the world. For example, while in developed countries this ratio stands at 11.4, in the case of India it reaches 22.0. It is even low in the CIS (10.9), Western Asia (15.3) and Latin America (16.6). This requires recruiting quality teachers and strengthening the teachers needed to manage classes. I also think that like in developed countries where students are given teaching assignments on time..

Essay / Indian Education System: Private School vs. Public School by 35%, from 0.22 million in 2010-11 to 0.30 million in 2015-16 – while the number of public schools increased by only 1%, from 1.03 million to 1, 04 million. According to Gandhi, small public schools (with 20 students or less) and small ones (with 50 students or less) are being abandoned. Over the past five years, the number of small public schools has increased by 52% and the number of small public schools by 33.7%. No less than 5,044 public schools had no students during the 2015-2016 year, an increase of 14% compared to the 4,435 public schools in 2010-2011. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay The migration of students from public schools has rendered many of them non-competent, with high per-student spending and low ratio quality-price of public schools. education expenses. Around 24,000 government schools in Rajasthan, Maharashtra and Chhattisgarh have closed their doors. West Bengal saw a 280% increase in the number of small schools – more than any other state – followed by Madhya Pradesh (225%) and Jharkhand (131%). However, Bihar bucked the national trend by reporting a 98% decline in the number of small schools. Government. Indian teachers earn four times more than those in China, but their results are worse. Indian government teachers earn more than their counterparts in private schools, but also in other countries. Despite being paid at least four times the salary of teachers in China, Indian teachers' performance, judged by students' level of understanding, was poor on the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) test. ) in 2009, India ranked 73rd. and China ranks second out of 74 countries. PISA is a global study conducted by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in member and non-member countries on the academic achievement of 15-year-old students in mathematics, science and reading. Comparison of Indian education system with foreign countries. educational systemIndian education focuses more on theory than practice. This does not allow creativity. Whereas abroad; they prioritize hands-on learning more. And they let creativity into education. Education is a formality for every Indian. They must obtain a degree in engineering or medicine; whether they learned anything or not. In foreign countries, education is considered a learning process. Their program includes everything from arts to sports to academics. The United States offers arts, sports, music and theater in its programs. Australia is focusing more on sport; they have cricket, hockey and boxing in their academic program. Whereas, in the Indian education system, the focus is only on studies. There is no place for extracurriculars in our system. In Dubai: primary and secondary education is free and made compulsory by law. Whereas in India, education is a thriving industry. From privatization of education to tuition fees and coaching institutes. Education generates a lot of money in the economy In India, students do not have a choice to choose their field of interest. You have to become an engineer or a doctor! Sports and the arts are considered to be for scraps. If you are not admitted to thebusiness science sector; you choose the arts. This is what Indians feel. In India; students are admitted to majors that have a higher salary scale or a higher number of jobs. And in a foreign country; Students are admitted based on their area of interest. In India; students are admitted by seeing the trends. So, if in a given year, the majority of students rush into mechanical engineering, you are bound to get admission into mechanical engineering. Students do not have the choice to select their area of specialty. In short in India; we go with the flow. Whereas, like in foreign countries, students wait to get admission in their field of study.interest. Students must memorize facts and figures. Thousands of mathematical equations, birth and death dates of freedom fighters, chemical reactions and hundreds of other things. We emphasize theory. And in foreign countries, they impact students' knowledge through practical implementation. The Indian education system teaches old technologies. The education system did not change much after independence. Indian education system is very bad in adopting latest technology in school curriculum. In foreign countries; The syllabus changes every day according to the upgradation of technology and industry requirements. And finally, we believe in grades and certificates. We believe in admission to IITs and IIMs. Foreign countries believe in skills. They don't care more about the educational institution, all they see is what you learned during your schooling. Problems and Challenges Facing Indian Education System Education Expenditure In terms of expenditure incurred on education, especially for higher education, during the year In 2010-11, the government spent around 15,440 million rupees, or about 85 percent of the revised budget estimates for the year. The recent 66th NSSO survey reveals that between 1999 and 2009, spending on education in general jumped by 378 percent in rural areas and 345 percent in urban areas of the country. The survey further reveals that spending on children's education is seeing a sharp increase – 63 percent for rural families and 73 percent for urban families. However, if we measure education spending as a percentage of GDP, India lags behind some developed/developing countries. We recognize that the education investment gap in India can perhaps be bridged by the crucial role of the private sector. At present, in India, there are around 1.86 million students enrolled in various higher education streams, including business management.3 Despite the large number of students studying in various streams, we We have not seen a major change in productivity because skills and talents are deficient. to support economic activities and hence there are serious concerns about the employability of these educated people. The gross enrollment ratio (GER) in higher education in India was 12 percent in 2010. However, the level of enrollment varies across states. We must also recognize that our level of registration is much lower than that of many other countries. For example, according to one report, the GER is 23 percent for China, 34 percent for Brazil, 57 percent for the United Kingdom, 77 percent for Australia and Russia and 83 percent for UNITED STATES. In this context, the attempt by government authorities to increase the number of students by 2020 in order to achieve a GERof 30 percent becomes a significant challenge. No, the launch of new institutes like JRE School of Management can play a catalytic role in meeting the challenge of increasing GER in India. As a positive step, for the remaining duration of the Eleventh Five Year Plan, the government has taken initiatives to encourage states to establish/expand existing educational institutions, establish 8 universities and expand colleges to achieve a target registration of one million students. and projects to create model colleges in regions whose GER is below the national average. Capacity UtilizationAnother challenge in strengthening the Indian education system is to improve capacity utilization. For example, a recent study on capacity utilization in India for higher education indicates that capacity utilization in case of MBA is around 57 per cent in Maharashtra and 72 per cent in Haryana. In some states, there are many vacant seats in institutions. On the one hand, we need to improve our GER and on the other hand, we need to ensure that the institutions/colleges/schools established to provide higher education make full use of the capacities created. Infrastructure is one of the factors why capacity utilization is low in number of upcoming/new institutions/colleges (both in private and public sectors) is their inability to provide the physical infrastructure required for the functioning of the institutions. Desirable infrastructure for ranking higher quality institutions includes real estate, state-of-the-art classrooms, library, hostels, furniture, sports facilities, transportation, commercial buildings, etc. We must ensure apolitical participation of the private sector in the establishment of colleges to provide quality physical infrastructure. PPP Model The government is making efforts to improve the education system in terms of various parameters such as GER, quality, investments, infrastructure, etc. But we must recognize the constraints on government to make a big turnaround with huge investments in education. We believe that the private sector has started playing a distinctive role in improving the education system in India. In this context, it is useful to explore the possibility of a public-private partnership (PPP) model in education. This will not only reduce the burden on the government in terms of high costs of providing basic infrastructure but also lead to the construction of state-of-the-art buildings, laboratories, libraries, hostels, etc. companies would help in organizing joint research and development, enabling students to be exposed to industrial activities in terms of internships, corporate training during vacations and issuance of certificates by companies for participating in internship/ training, etc. and, thus, facilitate the construction of the image and branding of institutions. and make students more job worthy. Student-Teacher Ratio Another challenge to improve the Indian education system is to improve the student-teacher ratio. In India, this ratio is very high compared to some comparable countries in the world. For example, while in developed countries this ratio stands at 11.4, in the case of India it reaches 22.0. It is even low in the CIS (10.9), Western Asia (15.3) and Latin America (16.6). This requires recruiting quality teachers and strengthening the teachers needed to manage classes. I also think that like in developed countries where students are given teaching assignments on time..

Navigation

« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 Next »

Get In Touch