Free will is the concept that we are willing to have some choice in how we act and assumes that we are liberal in choosing our behavior. Free will has been presented as an illusion and determinism is the belief that all behavior has a cause and is predictable. Our behavior is governed by internal or external forces over which we have no control. We can choose how we act, behave, and feel to the extent that our brains make us believe, something called “soft determinism.” Soft determinism is the idea that our external or internal forces can make us feel, constrain, and ultimately influence us to behave in a certain way, but there is an element of free will in the choices we make and it is not a total illusion. In a debate between free will and determinism, we have determinism. Particularly mild determinism. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on "Why violent video games should not be banned"? Get the original essay The term "free will" has emerged over the last two millennia as a canonical designator for an important type of control over one's actions . Some will say that free will is the only right answer. Using deterministic arguments to undermine people's belief in free will has led to a number of negative results, including increased cheating and aggression. It was also associated with a reduction in helping behaviors and fewer feelings of gratitude. We can understand free will because we must always hold ourselves accountable for our behavior and actions. Some go so far as to define “free will” as “the strongest controlling condition necessary for moral responsibility.” A person is morally responsible for performing an action and deserves to be blamed if it is morally wrong. By using determinism we allow ourselves to not take responsibility for what we do and the concept of free will requires us to take responsibility. Determinism is the one belief in which many people try to blame what they do, but in reality, the internal and external forces that surround you daily affect your emotional and physical well-being, whether negative or positive . Thus showing that we also have determinism. Soft determinists are about explaining how our actions can be both predetermined and free. You can predict your reactions to certain events or situations over which you have no control, such as crying over a movie. It made you feel a feeling you had no control over and it made you cry. According to the soft determinist, your desires, decisions, and volitions (your entire character) are ultimately determined by other factors that are also beyond your control. Examples, your genetic makeup, your upbringing and your environment. Some examples of free will are choices like the weather or not committing a crime. Free will would mean that a person is fully responsible for their actions. I understand that you might say: “yes, we are all responsible for our actions”. but there are circumstances in which soft determinism comes into play and external or internal forces influence us to make these decisions. For example, being poor is something that would influence the commission of the crime of theft. The person is more likely to steal out of desperation than a rich person and this does notDon't stress about paying as much money as you need to buy things. This does not mean that just because someone is poor they will steal and have no control over whether they do it or not, but they will have more desire and influence (soft determinism) depending on the external force/situation in question. We must believe it through determinism that our actions and thoughts are controlled by our unconscious. This suggests that determinism suppresses freedom and dignity and devalues ​​human behavior. It underestimates the uniqueness of human beings and their freedom. But if we fight against determinism, we reject the scientific approach to explaining behavior as it is. We can predict events based on things that may have happened before, leading to an influence on a person's actions and behaviors. Examples such as a blow to the head they received earlier in life, recent relationship or work stresses, perhaps even a psychiatric problem. This can also be proven by people with autism or mental illness. Do they really have free will? No, they are controlled by their conscience. Another example is people with OCD, who lose control of their thoughts and actions, and people with depression lose control of their emotions. People in violent situations acquire learned behaviors based on their environment. So, we don't have complete free will at all and science proves it. Through depression, OCD, and abuse, free will can be affected by determinism. People with depression and OCD often feel unable to exercise free will due to a lack of control or a depressed state of their emotions. The same goes for people who are in emotionally or physically abusive relationships. They fall into determinism because they learn behaviors after years of mistreatment. They only know what they have been surrounded by. Their only free will is to find a way to get help. The words or actions of others affect them and they have no free will to stop what that person is doing physically and mentally. There is no way for them to stop being hurt by the abuse of others. Getting help for situations like OCD, depression, and abuse is the only way that people suffering from these chemical imbalances or situations can have true freedom and agency in their lives. In some cases, people do not even find a way to get help for these problems, they fall into complete determinism and have no hope. This is the idea of ​​soft determinism, because there is always something you can control, but it's about overcoming it and being honest with your degree of control over a situation, emotion or behavior. The idea is how you react to your actions and emotions. You might want to say that it's the two (free will and determinism) against each other or opposites. However, philosophers recognize four possible views regarding both: both true, both false, and either/or. Compatibilism, the theory that both can be true at the same time, is popular because most people want to believe in both. Then again, the theory that they are both false is equally popular; because that's what current science seems to imply. These are both very controversial topics. It does not seem correct to say that we have complete free will nor complete determinism. I think the statement should be marked as.