There are different interpretations of everyone on what education means to them. According to Rousseau, it is the inner development of the child, according to JF Herbert, education is the development of good morality. The main question to ask is: “Is there sufficient education provision in society and, if it exists, can everyone have access to it”? According to studies carried out by research organizations and universities, there is a greater demand and less supply of education in society, which is a very critical question and then "who should be held responsible for ensuring to an appropriate provision of education, is it the government or the people only? We cannot blame people for just because they are not participating in the development process, if they do not have enough resources to support themselves, how can they even think about getting educated? This is particularly the case in India. The government provides free education to children aged 6 to 14, but after that, no provision is made for poverty-stricken people. The government-run education system gives freedoms to people belonging to communities like Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes. and OBCs but among them some have a very good financial situation and can benefit from the provision made to them and which is also called "reserve", but the other half remains between the two because they do not have enough funds to study. they therefore do not have access to education. This type of vicious circle leads to social reproduction, which means maintaining the same financial status as that of the ancestors. The rich class can easily pass through the whole educational process and they tend to become rich...... middle of paper...... taken advantage of low tuition fees and help from l state-funded education. Schultz's main argument As human capital theory was that underinvestment in education and training prevailed, the essence of human capital is that people invest in themselves and for the sake of future gains and that what one invests today, he gets a return later in the future life. Human capital theory has failed for the following reasons: 1) Recent expansion of schooling in underdeveloped countries and the United States does not increase productivity 2) Poverty has persisted and education programs and training designed to eliminate it have not succeeded. 3) Few jobs also increased, followed by income4) This is considered morally wrong by many economists because they say that then people become slaves as soon as a first investment is made on them and then they are used as a commodity for labor..