Assisted suicide and euthanasia are phenomena that have developed over the last 20 years. They are similar because they both have to do with the loss of another human being's life. While assisted suicide is defined as the act of prescribing a drug or lethal dose to a patient by a doctor and the person can decide when to take the dose, euthanasia is the practice of killing a sick person to whom a doctor actively participates. the process. PAS and euthanasia are legal in Belgium, Colombia, India, Ireland, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, Oregon, Washington, Montana and Vermont. For years, there has been an ongoing debate about assisted dying. Some groups think it shouldn't be charged as murder, while others think it should. In this essay, the reader will discover some of the main reasons why a government passes a law to make them [SAP and euthanasia] legal. Assisted dying should not be legalized because there are cases where it is difficult to determine whether it is murder. or assisted suicide. This is because it looks a lot like homicide. The difference between them lies in the reasons why someone decides to end another person's life. The Kenneth Minor case is one of the most popular cases in which the difficulty of differentiating between murder and assisted suicide has received public attention. In 2009, Minor, a drug addict with a criminal record, insisted he helped Jeffrey Locker, a public speaker, commit suicide so his family would receive nearly $16 million in insurance policies. Locker's corpse had been stabbed to death. Minor even claimed that he held the knife while Locker pressed his chest on the knife. Then evidence emerged that Locker had faced economic problems before... middle of paper ... and that life was worth living and worth fighting for. They should never solve the problem of suffering by eliminating those who suffer. Legalizing physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia is a big step forward. In fact, it’s an immense freedom. The problem is that human society is not ready to face such liberation. Statistics have shown that humans have difficulty handling it. Doctors can abuse their power, individuals can make a bad decision, and things can spiral out of control. If this happens, some of the possible consequences are the death of thousands of patients through involuntary euthanasia, the abuse of vulnerable people, or a damaged doctor-patient relationship. Should society take this risk when the history of recent years shows that the assisted dying procedure does not work properly? Are people ready for this??