blog




  • Essay / Philosophy is not for everyone

    Earlier in my first article I commented that anyone could do philosophy, based on Jostein Gaarder in Sophies Welt's book. Philosophers like Bertrand Russell and even Socrates himself believed that anyone who used reason and asked the right questions could become a philosopher. And they were right, anyone can be a philosopher, but that doesn't mean philosophy can be for everyone. You will find this statement somewhat arrogant and self-centered and you may right now think that I am an elitist who believes that knowledge can only be discovered by those who belong to a selective bourgeoisie who have the privilege to study and can attend expensive universities. , and so. When I say that philosophy is not for everyone, I am referring to that generalization that is used to make mass success so non-personal that it does not require any sort of prior knowledge or complex cognitive abilities. . Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get an original essay The simple mass man who thinks he knows everything when he really knows nothing. When we talk about knowledge and begin to understand its universality, we become a philosopher; it is only by recognizing our own ignorance in the face of the grandeur of the world that we truly understand what philosophy is about. A philosopher is one who understands that it is impossible for him to know everything even if he wants to risk understanding and giving explanations on the functioning of a Universe full of infinite knowledge. There is a limit to the fundamental simplification and reductionism of the mass belief in the epistemology of knowledge. Our society today is immersed in an absurd simplification of knowledge, YouTube videos explaining theorems of more than a thousand pages or opinion articles summarizing and simplifying all scientific research in terms of loss of the inherent value of the material . This is what we have arrived at, a society where consuming knowledge is not a priority because the priority is to condense knowledge without even fully understanding it. By condensing knowledge, the essence of what was previously proposed is lost. It is desirable that knowledge and philosophy reach as many people as possible, but it must be understood that philosophy requires a degree of complexity that goes beyond simple summaries and explanations for “dummies”. ". When we talk about the complexity of ideas, we are talking about systems of thought that cannot be reduced to a simple page. Nowadays, any type of content is commoditized in order to make it much more “digestible” for people. Skip from the academic to the absurd, to banal entertainment A clear example of this is the postmodern tendency to analyze Nietzsche's Übermesch or, even worse, when the example is the famous phrase Gott ist tot - God. is death This sentence is a clear example that philosophy is not understood by everyone, this sentence has become popular among the masses without reading it before, just follow any philosophy page on. Facebook or any pseudo-scholar on YouTube to see the misuse of the phrase, and these guys just use it because it seems forceful against fundamentalist and religious speeches And my dear reader, you will think that n. t's not a problem, however, the meaning and context of Nietzsche's definitions are not broadcast every time someone has misunderstood the phrase and popularizes it and uses it to look cool. Phrases and aphorisms of philosophy cannot be reduced to simple..