Table of contentsPunishment versus rehabilitation to achieve a harmless solutionUseful goals of the concept of rehabilitationConclusionWorks CitedThe question of the effectiveness of rehabilitation versus harsh punishment has been widely debated . While dealing with crime. Many debates focus on what is better for punishment or rehabilitation of inmates, as the two concepts are distinct from each other. Crime is obviously the most damaging factor within society and which affects the population. The goal of criminal justice is to reduce crime in society. It is possible to end crime through deliverance, but the real problem is how to change the corrupt mentality of a person who has engaged in illegal behavior. It is generally accepted that harsh punishments are an inhumane way of dealing with criminals, because they may not get another chance. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”? Get the original Punishment VS Rehabilitation essay to achieve a harmless condition solution. There is good reason to believe that rehabilitation is the most valuable justification for punishment, because it alone promotes the humanizing belief that offenders can be saved and not simply punished. Taxman and Rudes (2011:236) assert that “offenders are more likely to change their behavior in response to the actions of the correctional agency than in response to the stated goals of sentencing.” The ideal of rehabilitation alone conveys the message that the state has an obligation to help those who do not meet the standards of behavior it has set. These people are often those who are most socially disadvantaged and have been forced into a life of crime. The ideal of rehabilitation does not ignore society and the victim. In fact, it is because she values ​​their rights so highly that she strives to change the offender and prevent his reoffending. In seeking to reduce recidivism and crime, it seeks to constructively promote society's right to security and protect individuals from victimization. In addition, rehabilitation has another important value: it recognizes the reality of social inequalities. It is said that some offenders need help to rehabilitate, that is, to accept the idea that circumstances may constrain them and lead them to criminality. A guide to judges' sentencing decisions with the goal of rehabilitation is said to be the most flexible and sensible guidance. Additionally, rehabilitation as a convict guide can give offenders who have learned from their mistakes the chance to receive a lighter sentence. Killiars and Villetaz (2008: 29) state that “based on a systematic review of some 23 studies (out of 300 initially located), it is concluded that most studies show lower recidivism rates after a non-custodial sanction of liberty only after a custodial sanction. '. Rehabilitation is not only important when the court decides the sentence, it is also important when it comes to actually carrying out the sentence. The role of the criminal justice system does not end with sentencing, but it is also the duty of the state and society to help it change. Offenders must receive meaningful job training through behavioral treatment programs. Rehabilitation aimed to mentally prepare offenders to adapt to society. Punishments ratherSevere measures were intended to teach them a lesson. It is believed that rehabilitation will show them their mistakes and help them become a useful part of society. Some people disagree with the above statements and would say that rehabilitation is not as effective as harsh punishment. Tullock (1974: 103) states that "most economists who think seriously about the problems of crime immediately conclude that punishment will indeed have a deterrent effect on crime" (Tullock, 1974). Tullock explains why most economists believe that "if you increase the cost of something, less will be consumed." So if you increase the cost of committing a crime, there will be fewer crimes. Furthermore, it is affirmed that crime is not a pathology, that it is not the product of circumstances, and certainly not the product of coincidence. It is the result of choices made by the individual and justice must therefore condemn these choices when they violate the rules of society. Retributivism advocates that the most serious crimes should be punished more harshly, due to the greater violation of our rules. They believed that retribution had more power to change a person than rehabilitation. Rehabilitation will show them the mistake they made and how to improve it, but punishment will make them understand that their wrongdoings may cause them, even more, to not try to change or break the laws. Furthermore, rehabilitation does not work in cases of serious problems. crimes. An injustice is committed if one attempts to correct the offender. The suffering of the victim's family will increase and public confidence in the criminal justice system will decrease. Retributive theories are retrospective and justify punishment in terms of "its intrinsic justice as a response to the crime." Offenders are held responsible for their crime by imposing sanctions whose harm is roughly equivalent to that inflicted on their victims. The state and its appointed agents have an ethical obligation to punish offenders simply because of the nature of the wrongful act and not for other reasons such as the beneficial consequences that flow from it (Drivers, 2006). It is also argued that harsh treatment, such as imprisonment, is sometimes obligatory because of the wrongs they have committed and rightly expresses social disapproval. "while most research on deterrence found that the death penalty had virtually the same effect as long-term imprisonment on homicide rates, by the mid-1970s." Useful objectives of the concept of rehabilitation Although this point of view may seem convincing, in reality, the concept of rehabilitation is based on the assumption that criminal behavior is caused by certain factors. It cannot be denied that they are choosing to break the law. It is said that most offenders are not criminals by birth or choice; if their involvement in crime is caused by various factors, then recidivism can be reduced through correctional measures. The goal of rehabilitation is to correct the offender so that he or she is made capable of reentering society and functioning as a law-abiding member of the community. Rehabilitation was seen as a humane alternative to retribution and deterrence. Although rehabilitation was previously widely criticized, it has become increasingly accepted and it has been shown that a carefully implemented rehabilitation program can reduce recidivism. Societies become more civilized; they should overcome the desire for revenge because the philosophy of punishment is outdated. It is also argued that punishing criminals simply because., 66(2), 22-29.