1. Communication strategy.2. Evolution of Theory X and Theory Y.3. Feedback through the design and development of the work.4. Behavioral Consideration.Behavioral consideration is the most analytical part which makes this theory more practical.[A0 3]3.3 Usefulness of Motivation TheoriesThe usefulness of motivation and organizational success are interdependent. These theories define the real optimization of the organization. Leadership focus also changes due to these factors. Financial improvement is the optimal outcome of these motivators (Fisher, 2005). The reward, gratitude and punishment system is a good technique to judge employees (Smith and Rupp, 2003) and the work strategy model compels employees to give their best. Involving motivation theories in the organization reduces complexity and encourages employees to convince themselves to work and become capable of generating accomplishment. From the above discussion, it is clear that employee involvement through motivation is essential for the organization. In this regard, the hybrid model of motivation that is the work strategy model should be effective. M/S Hogan should be expected to develop a proper communication model and come up with a system of reward and punishment. This brings the employees' perspective into focus and the motivators will make them think that they are not just working for the organization but rather for themselves. LO 4: Mechanism for developing teamwork [P4, M4 and D4] [AO 4 ][AO 4.1]M. Gibson of Britannia Home Manufacturer demonstrated teamwork within the organization. To describe optimal teamwork behavior, the group and group behavior in the organization must be understood:...... middle of article......: April 19, 2014.Fisher, JG (2005), How to Run Incentive Programs Successfully 3rd Edition, Kogan Page, London, UKHarshr (2013). [Online]. Available at: http://www.slideshare.net/Harshr1501/groups-in-organizations-and-group-dynamics. Accessed: April 18, 2014. Heyer, J., Stewart, F. and Thorp, R. (19999). Group Behavior and Development James AF Stoner, R. Edward Freeman, Daniel R. Gilbert (1995), “Management”, 6th edition, USA: Prentice Hall. Professor of law. (2014). [Online]. Available at: http://www.lawteacher.net/international-law/essays/compare-and-contrast-different-organizational-structure-and-culture-law-essay.php. Accessed: April 18, 2014.Maslaw, A (1943). Maslaw's law of hierarchical needs. McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of business. New York: McGraw-Hill. McShane, S. and VonGlinow, Mary A. (2005). Organizational behavior: emerging