The concept of power is at the heart of the study of international politics. International politics has been defined as influencing the major nations of the world to advance a nation's goals against the opposition of other nations. It is therefore not surprising that power, whether exercised through influence or control, is a dominant and closely related concept in discussions when it comes to the study of international politics. Before discussing the fundamental nature of power in international relations, it is necessary to consider what exactly power is. Power in the study of international politics can be derived in several ways as a goal of states or individuals; as a measure of influence or control over actors, events, outcomes and international affairs; as reflecting triumph in conflict and the attainment of security; such as control of capabilities and resources. Power can be broadly thought of as the ability to manipulate others into acting in our best interest and to prevent them from doing the same to us. Power is the creation, in and through social relations, of outcomes that characterize the ability of actors to act in the same way. find out their status and fate. This broad concept involves two fundamental essential dimensions: the types of social relations through which power is exercised in relations of interaction or in social relations of constitutions and the specificity of the social relations through which effects are produced. The more power encourages people to make choices in terms of foreign policy; the lesser-known “balance of power” theory, in which nations compete for dominance in a complicated chess game of military spending and diplomatic posturing. Possession of power allows individuals and countries to successfully support and protect their interests middle of paper......Jammu and Kashmir between India and Pakistan. Stronger states like the United States waged war against weaker states like Vietnam. It is interesting to note that the defeat of the United States in Vietnam and the Soviet Union in Afghanistan demonstrates a more complex conception of power, which goes beyond simple financial or military force. In fact, many current theories of international relations dispute that power as conventionally described by realists is inherently vague and open to analysis based on a particular state of affairs. Nevertheless, one can successfully conclude that power is primarily associated with what a state can prevent another state from doing to it and what a state can do. The ways in which power is exercised may change, but the fundamental nature of competing desires and interests remains predominant in defining international relations..