Table of ContentsIntroductionNIPPMy Sector and the Threat of ChoiceEstablish Goals and ObjectivesIdentify InfrastructureAssess and Analyze RiskImplement Risk Management StrategiesMeasure EffectivenessConclusionIntroductionAccording U.S. state law, critical structures are primarily defined as any asset, resource system that is of indispensable importance to the welfare and well-being of the country. The destruction of these critical structures can have detrimental effects on the political, social, and economic position of the United States relative to other countries. The security of these critical structures has therefore raised concerns about their protection against unforeseen risks and dangers. Thus, Homeland Security fulfills its obligation to protect these critical structures from internal and external threats. Say no to plagiarism. Get a tailor-made essay on “Why violent video games should not be banned”? Get an original essay The importance of critical structures is manifested by the fact that they control important and vital resources, which directly benefit many of individuals in the world. UNITED STATES. Examples of these resources include: water, transportation and electricity. Proper care is therefore essential to protect these critical infrastructures from any emerging threats. The draft Homeland Security Plan is consistent with the need to protect and ensure the well-being of these critical structures. NIPPNIPP stands for National Infrastructure Protection Plan. This is a federal government-led project with the aim of achieving a lasting solution to the continued increase in threats to critical structures in the country. The result is collaboration between the federal government and private key infrastructure owners. This is with the aim of achieving complete security against the existing dangers and threats faced by critical infrastructures. President Obama in 2013 called for the equal development of an updated national plan. This was to counter reported threats to the security of critical infrastructure in terms of dangers and risks. The president also called for an equivalent improvement in cybersecurity in critical infrastructure. This involved coordinating owners of critical infrastructure, with the aim of regulating the sharing of vital information. The federal government has also decided to work collaboratively with critical infrastructure owners, with the goal of implementing appropriate risk-based approaches to cybersecurity. My sector and the threat of choiceMy field of choice is emergency services. Emergency services normally involve rapid response to threats caused by intentional faults, unintentional faults and finally by natural disasters. The “ESS” emergency services sector is known to encompass a system of adequate preparedness and immediate response in the equal prevention and appropriate mitigation of emerging and reported risks. The danger of the ESS sector or emergency services that I have chosen to discuss is “The Airplane as a Weapon”. ". In order to justify this example, I would like to refer to an actual historical event. During the attacks of September 11, 2011, two airliners crashed into the World Trade Center complex. The weakening of security has damaged the army's reputation and international image. The United States suffered the loss of nearly 3,000 people and the loss of critical infrastructure worth approximately $10 billion. Valid objectives must therefore beincorporated to allow for equal preparedness in the event such an incident occurs again. [1]Establish Goals and ObjectivesIn response to this risk under discussion, appropriate objectives must be incorporated to eliminate the likelihood or possibility of the tragedy occurring again. An effective risk management framework is therefore necessary to ensure that critical infrastructure protection is carried out to avoid manipulation by any threat. With close reference to the NIPP, the particular risk management framework can be directly applied to the “aircraft as weapon” risk. Proper implementation of this context will reduce the magnitude of losses incurred when a threat hits critical infrastructure. The main aim and objectives of the federal government in such a case are to lay down appropriate foundations that will withstand complete damage in similar circumstances. Information dissemination and management will also require monitoring to identify threats before they become unmanageable. level. Security has also been beefed up at places like airports and airfields to eliminate the risks of a possible “plane as weapon” situation as a threat to national security. The NIPP also identifies a set of national objectives for efforts to appropriately mitigate risks. This is equal security and resilience for existing critical infrastructure. An example of such a goal is to expand the existing partnership between private owners of critical infrastructure and the federal government. It is therefore essential to develop appropriate goals and objectives that will guide key institutions towards prosperity and continued success. Identify Infrastructure Identifying infrastructure in critical infrastructure is an important consideration in addressing the risk in question. Infrastructure includes the resources and systems necessary for the continued operation of critical infrastructure. With a fair discussion and proper analysis of the risk management framework, it is evident that effective solutions to threats to critical infrastructure are required. Therefore, the same security and resilience must be considered when designing assets, systems and networks. Buildings currently under development must meet certain standards and regulated procedures. This will minimize the level of damage or loss caused by a repeat of such an event. Infrastructure control systems must also be designed to accurately identify, deter, disrupt, detect and prepare for threats or hazards. Better communication services and different operational models must therefore be compared, choosing only the best ones, those that avoid risks and are well secured. This applies to my threat of aircraft as a weapon, whereby appropriate infrastructure would have identified the threat before it occurred or minimized the extent of casualties. Assess and analyze risksSo that the federal government and partners of the private sector accurately assess and analyze risks, timely, reliable, accurate and actionable information is necessary to achieve the desired results. Bringing together the value of understanding cyber and physical systems will help risk assessors draw valid conclusions about proposed remedies for these threats. Proper risk assessment and analysis is therefore necessary in the sense that critical infrastructure risk assessment is carried out taking into account the threat, vulnerability and.