Table of ContentsThe Problem of Illegal ImmigrationBorder WallWorks Cited The Problem of Illegal ImmigrationIntroduction: Every day, thousands of illegal immigrants arrive from Mexico are coming to the United States, taking advantage of our jobs, our industries and our money. This will continue until we act. For centuries, America has prided itself on being a community open to all, bringing strength to the weak and hope to the hopeless. Although the idea of ​​openness to all is important in our society, illegal immigration is becoming more and more of a problem, rapidly destroying our economy and pushing our country further into debt, while harming our society in its whole. Say no to plagiarism. Get a custom essay on “Why Violent Video Games Should Not Be Banned”?Get the original essayBorder WallBackground: Taking effect as early as the 1960s, the proposed construction of a wall along the US-US border Mexican law began quickly and effectively neutralized the dangers of illegal immigration, but this wall was not and still is not always supported. Some may argue that the wall spreads a racist message and causes damage to our economy due to the ever-increasing costs required to maintain such a project, but contrary to these opinions, a wall has proven to be effective in reduce illegal immigration at the highest cost. -profit report. Thesis Statement: Because a wall has proven to be the most effective method of protection, coupled with the fact that large numbers of people are immigrating to the United States illegally, illegally taking advantage of our resources and destroying our economy, It is imperative to build a wall between our two nations in order to protect our nation from threats to our legal citizens. Topic Sentence: Some may not support a wall for two main reasons, such as that the wall will be too expensive to finance, and that it is a racist statement aimed at the entire world. Convinced that a wall will not solve any problem, opponents of the wall look for arguments to prove the truth of their views. As Peter Schrag, a journalist specializing in California politics and political history, says in his article on the effectiveness of the wall in stopping illegal immigration: “More than 670 miles of border fences and walls.Introduction: Every Today, thousands of illegal immigrants from Mexico are entering the United States, taking advantage of our jobs, our industries and our money. This will continue until we act. For centuries, America has prided itself on being a community open to all, bringing strength to the weak and hope to the hopeless. Although the idea of ​​openness to all is important in our society, illegal immigration is becoming more and more of a problem, rapidly destroying our economy and pushing our country further into debt, while harming our society in its whole. As early as the 1960s, plans to build a wall along the US-Mexico border were launched, quickly and effectively neutralizing the dangers of illegal immigration, but this wall was not and still is not. not always supported. Some may argue that the wall spreads a racist message and causes damage to our economy due to the ever-increasing costs required to maintain such a project, but contrary to these opinions, a wall has proven to be effective in reduce illegal immigration at the highest cost. -benefit ratio.Thesis statement: Because a wall has proven to be the most effective method of protection, coupled with the fact that a large number ofpeople are immigrating illegally to the United States, illegally taking advantage of our resources and destroying our economy, it is imperative that we build a wall between our two nations in order to protect our nation from threats to our legal citizens. Topic sentence: Some may not support a wall for two main reasons, such as that the wall will be too expensive to fund, and that it is a racist statement aimed at the entire world. Convinced that a wall will not solve any problem, opponents of the wall look for arguments to prove the truth of their views. Evidence and Citations: As Peter Schrag, a journalist specializing in California politics and political history, says in his article on the effectiveness of the wall in stopping illegal immigration: "More than 670 miles of border fencing, walls , bollards and spikes that Congress enacted in 2006 at an estimated cost of $4 billion (plus future maintenance) are almost complete The Border Patrol, which grew from 9,000 agents in 2001 to 20,000 in 2009. , costs about $4 billion a year” (Schrag: As he says, the wall costs money, and a lot of money. It won't be possible to maintain it, and that's it. One of the main arguments against building a wall Although this is a problem, because money is and always will be a concern, opponents of a wall do not seem to understand that we can easily afford such a feat. The wall can easily be refuted by the simple fact that the US budget for 2019 alone exceeds four trillion dollars, which, compared to a possible twenty billion, completely eradicates the idea that a wall would be too expensive. Topic Sentence: Like one of the other points made by the Democratic side of the argument, the idea of ​​a wall is fundamentally racist. Evidence and citation: Mark Karlin, political researcher and journalist who found flaws in the arguments presented by opposing camps. , presents his view on the real reasons for building the wall: “The origins of the billions of dollars spent on this largely symbolic and highly visible wall actually begin much further north with American organizations and individuals advocating a structure of white political power, groups like one recently represented at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), which argues that a multicultural society is a danger to America” (Karlin). He claims that a wall will directly block our cultural growth and will not actually solve the fundamental problems, being a symbol of white supremacy rather than a real solution. He argues that a wall is racist and will only negatively drain our workforce and citizens. Comment: This idea that a wall is racist is inherently false and the statements provided stretch the truth somewhat. Evidence and quotes: The wall is not supposed to be against the Latino and Hispanic populations, the wall is only there to protect American citizens from the danger of illegal immigration, without racist ulterior motives. It happens to be on the southwest border, and because it ends up affecting the population of non-white people immigrating illegally from Mexico, opponents of the wall will latch onto that fact and call it racist , in order to promote their point of view. Even though a wall may cost money or be considered racist, these arguments are not enough to deter the construction of a wall, because the reasons behind these arguments are based on pseudo-claims and invalid evidence . Topic sentence: A wall has been proven time and time again to be a viable solution for restoring security alongour border, and crime rates and illegal activity have plummeted wherever a wall has been erected. Evidence and Citations: Using statistics provided by the Department of Homeland Security, it can be argued that a wall is actually quite effective, as "[p]atrols in the Southwest have dramatically increased the amount of drugs, weapons and money seized during this period In the last three years: 74% more money, 41% more drugs and 159% more weapons have been apprehended. , crime rates fell in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Texas” (Department of Homeland Security, as other supporting studies show, walls proved to be the cause). most effective long-term solution, and the numbers only reinforce this point. With a wall, more money, drugs and weapons were confiscated and illegally imported, which only proves. the effectiveness of the wall However, without a wall, more and more immigrants and people are entering illegally every day, and our decision not to act will certainly not help matters. Evidence and Citations: As further proof of the functionality of walls, Alex K Rich and Heather Newton, both professors and graduate students of law and ethics, cite the Border Patrol to say that "[t]he evidence that border walls are Effective deterrents against illegal entry are demonstrated by the fact that cities with walls or similar barriers have seen a dramatic drop in the number of illegal immigrants crossing these points Border Patrol agents in Naco, Arizona. , for example, reported that the wall built there in 1996 cut illegal immigration in half in one year” (Rich and Newton 2) As Rich and Newton argue, the wall proved more effective. than any of the other solutions proposed, and it is one of the few solutions that has yielded concrete results. As noted, when the current wall was built, the length it spanned was massively reduced by half. of the number of illegal immigrants. The fact that the wall has accomplished such massive changes in such a short period of time proves that a wall is a necessary and practical solution. Evidence and Citation: Westley Parker, a researcher and journalist, asserts that "despite these shortcomings, the number of illegal aliens captured by U.S. Border Patrol fell dramatically as the Southwest Barrier grew longer—evidence that even a limited barrier can deter illegal immigration. » (Parker).Topic Sentence: Although the wall is not fully completed, even the completed wall has done wonders in terms of protecting our American citizens from illegal immigration. With a wall, it even deters people from trying to immigrate illegally, because it has become much more dangerous and difficult. Evidence and Quotes: Even if people attempt to cross, the wall is designed with the idea of ​​security checkpoints where people are apprehended and captured if they participate in illegal activities. Overall, a wall has proven to be effective and the reasons to build a wall far outweigh the reasons not to. Simply put, we cannot sustain the unlimited flow of immigrants, and as time passes, it is clear that we need better security. along our borders to protect our nation. Evidence and Quotes: As Alex Rich and Heather Newton say: “As long as the border is permeable, the Mexican government will have no incentive to create more Mexican jobs, since anyone who wants a job can simply cross the border into the United States. United” (Rich and Newton 2). The fact that the permeable boundary is aproblem reveals our fundamental problem with Mexico, because without any reason to change, the Mexican economy will collapse and we will suffer the consequences. Most will agree that Mexico has fallen on hard times. but because we do nothing and at least try to stop the flow, Mexico will do nothing either. We will continue to welcome illegal immigrants looking for work, and nothing will change. This goes to the main point that while a few immigrants may not pose too many problems, thousands of people every day can cause real problems within our economy. Topic Sentence: Completely debunk the idea that a wall would cost too much by providing Another shocking statistic, the Federation for American Immigration Reform claims that "federal, state, and local costs associated with more than $12.5 million of people living illegally in the United States amounts to approximately $135 billion per year. Evidence and Citation: After accounting for the tax contributions of this population, the group said the total economic impact of illegal immigration is approximately $116 billion per year (up from $113 billion in 2013) (O'Brien and Raley). Commentary: One of the main reasons people oppose a wall is cost, and the cost of a wall would only be $20 billion. , or just 18 percent of the $113 billion annual cost needed to support illegal immigration. Illegal immigration is, in fact, illegal, and the fact that people oppose a wall despite its insane benefits is unreal. This maneuver of building a wall would save so much money that it would blow all other numbers out of the water. A wall would save money, protect us from illegal immigration, and overall send a message to other countries that we are strong and will not back down if we feel threatened. Keep in mind: this is just a sample. Get a custom paper now from our expert writers.Get a Custom EssayConclusion Paragraph: As a necessary precaution to protect our nation, a wall must be built to reduce the number of illegal immigrants coming from our border with Mexico. This would be cost-effective and would significantly reduce the volume of illegal immigration. Even if the opposition claims that a wall would send racist signals and cost too much, it would simply be a statement that we are not afraid to back down and are willing to fight for our rights as Americans . It is our responsibility to protect our country, and the best way to do that is simply to build a wall. There are too many reasons why we cannot simply ignore our problems with Mexico and we must take steps to either reform our systems or establish defenses. Works Cited “The fencing of the southern border of the United States reflects American racism. » Should the United States close its borders?, edited by Louise Gerdes, Greenhaven Press, 2014. In question. Opposing Viewpoints in Context, https://link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/EJ3010615232/OVIC?u=powa9245&sid=OVIC&xid=3aa62ced.O'Brien, Matt and Spencer Raley. “The Tax Burden of Illegal Immigration on American Taxpayers | Federation for American Immigration Reform. Federation for American Immigration Reform, September 27, 2017, fairus.org/issue/publications-resources/fiscal-burden-illegal-immigration-united-states-taxpayers.Parker, Westley. “Border walls work.” American Renaissance, September 28, 2018, www.amren.com/features/2018/02/border-walls-work/. Rich, Alex K..